دورية أكاديمية

Science Advice as Procedural Rationality: Reflections on the National Research Council

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Science Advice as Procedural Rationality: Reflections on the National Research Council
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Feuer, Michael J., Maranto, Christina J.
المصدر: Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy. Sep 2010 48(3):259-275.
الإتاحة: Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.comTest
تمت مراجعته من قبل الزملاء: Y
Page Count: 17
تاريخ النشر: 2010
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
الواصفات: Reflection, Scientific Research, Sciences, Engineering, Health, Education, Science Interests, Science Programs, Scientific and Technical Information, Scientists, Consultants, Advisory Committees, Research Reports
مصطلحات جغرافية: United States
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-010-9152-0
تدمد: 0026-4695
مستخلص: Since its founding in 1863, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has occupied a special niche in the complex ecology of advice-giving in the United States. Established as a small, private organization with special responsibilities and obligations vis a vis the American people and government, the Academy has expanded considerably in the past century and a half and now releases, through the National Research Council (NRC), its operating arm, more than 200 reports per year, on topics covering nearly the entire range of science, engineering, health, and education. The development of the organization, its basic ethos, and its evolving structures and processes can be seen as examples of what Herbert Simon called "procedural rationality": the pursuit of reasonably good solutions to complex problems based on appropriate deliberation.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 33
Entry Date: 2010
رقم الانضمام: EJ898369
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:0026-4695
DOI:10.1007/s11024-010-9152-0