دورية أكاديمية

Does the Inclusion of a Genome-Wide Polygenic Score Improve Early Risk Prediction for Later Language and Literacy Delay?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Does the Inclusion of a Genome-Wide Polygenic Score Improve Early Risk Prediction for Later Language and Literacy Delay?
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Dale, Philip S., von Stumm, Sophie, Selzam, Saskia, Hayiou-Thomas, Marianna E.
المصدر: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. May 2020 63(5):1467-1478.
الإتاحة: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.orgTest
تمت مراجعته من قبل الزملاء: Y
Page Count: 12
تاريخ النشر: 2020
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
الواصفات: Genetics, Scores, Risk, Prediction, Language Impairments, Delayed Speech, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Oral Language, Decoding (Reading), Reading Comprehension, Expressive Language, Nonverbal Ability, Educational Attainment, Predictor Variables, Toddlers
DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00161
تدمد: 1092-4388
مستخلص: Purpose: The ability to identify children early in development who are at substantial risk for language/literacy difficulties would have great benefit both for the children and for the educational and therapeutic institutions that serve them. Information that is relatively easily available prior to the age of 3 years, such as late talking, family history of language/literacy difficulties, and socioeconomic status, have some but very limited predictive power. Here, we examine whether the inclusion of a DNA-based genome-wide polygenic score that has been shown to capture children's genetic propensity for educational attainment (EA3) adds enough prediction to yield a clinically useful score. Method: Data are longitudinal scores of 1,420 children from the Twins Early Development Study, who were assessed at ages 2 and 3 years on language and nonverbal ability and at 12 years of age on oral language, word decoding, and reading comprehension. Five risk factors were examined: expressive vocabulary, nonverbal ability (these two from parent report), family history, mothers' education, and EA3. Analyses were conducted both for continuous and categorically defined measures of risk and outcome. Results: Language and literacy abilities at 12 years of age were significantly but modestly predicted by the risk factors, with a small but significant added prediction from EA3. Indices of diagnostic validity for poor outcomes, such as sensitivity and area under the curve statistics, were poor in all cases. Conclusions: We conclude that, at present, clinically useful prediction from toddlerhood remains an unattained goal.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2020
رقم الانضمام: EJ1257312
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:1092-4388
DOI:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00161