دورية أكاديمية

The Relationship between Acquisition Rate for Words and Working Memory, Short-Term Memory, and Reading Skills: Aptitude-by-Treatment or Skill-by-Treatment Interaction?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Relationship between Acquisition Rate for Words and Working Memory, Short-Term Memory, and Reading Skills: Aptitude-by-Treatment or Skill-by-Treatment Interaction?
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Burns, Matthew K., Davidson, Katherine, Zaslofsky, Anne F., Parker, David C., Maki, Kathrin E.
المصدر: Assessment for Effective Intervention. Jun 2018 43(3):182-192.
الإتاحة: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.comTest
تمت مراجعته من قبل الزملاء: Y
Page Count: 11
تاريخ النشر: 2018
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Grade 4
الواصفات: Short Term Memory, Reading Skills, Language Acquisition, Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Intervention, Grade 4, Grade 5, Elementary School Students, Learning Disabilities, Correlation
مصطلحات جغرافية: Minnesota
DOI: 10.1177/1534508417730822
تدمد: 1534-5084
مستخلص: The amount of information that students successfully learn and later recall from each intervention session is limited and is called the acquisition rate (AR). Research has consistently supported the effects of modifying intervention set sizes with AR data, but research with AR is in its infancy. The current study compared the relationship between AR while learning words with working memory, short-term memory, and reading skills. Participants were 52 fourth- and fifth-grade students with and without learning disabilities (LDs). Working memory (r = 0.34), short-term memory (r = 0.41), and word reading skills (r = 0.57) all moderately correlated with AR, but word reading skills accounted for 32% of the variance and the other two scores added little unique variance. The corrected correlation coefficients were higher for the word reading with AR than with any other variable and were essentially equal for both groups (r = 0.73 for average readers and r = 0.75 for students with an LD in reading). Thus, the data not only support the validity of making decisions with AR data but also suggest that AR is more consistent with a skill-by-treatment interaction framework than an aptitude-by-treatment interaction approach. Potential applications, directions for future research, and limitations are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 80
Entry Date: 2018
رقم الانضمام: EJ1179489
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:1534-5084
DOI:10.1177/1534508417730822