دورية أكاديمية

Study of the in vitro and in vivo antileishmanial activities of nimodipine in susceptible BALB/c mice

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Study of the in vitro and in vivo antileishmanial activities of nimodipine in susceptible BALB/c mice
المؤلفون: Reza Azadi, Ghazal Alipour-Talesh, Mohammad Javad Yazdanpanah, Seyedeh Hoda Alavizadeh, Masoud Maleki, Mahnaz Banihashemi, Mahmoud Reza Jaafari
المصدر: Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, Vol 57, Iss 1, Pp 78-84 (2020)
بيانات النشر: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
المجموعة: LCC:Infectious and parasitic diseases
مصطلحات موضوعية: amastigote, balb/c mice, leishmania major, meglumine antimoniate, nimodipine, promastigote, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216
الوصف: Background & objectives: Pentavalent antimonials are the standard treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), however, treatment failures are frequent. Nimodipine, a calcium channel blocker is known to show promising antiprotozoal effects. Here, we investigated the antileishmanial effect of Nimodipine in both in vitro and in vivo BALB/c mice model of CL. We also compared the in vivo effect with amphotericin B and meglumine antimoniate in the experimental CL mice model. Methods: Colorimetric alamar blue assay and J774 A.1 mouse macrophage cells were used to determine the effect of nimodipine on promastigotes and amastigotes viability, respectively. Then, the in vivo activity of nimodipine was compared to that of conventional therapies in both the early and established courses of Leishmania major infection in susceptible non-healing BALB/c mice. Results: Nimodipine was highly active against promastigotes and amastigotes of L. major with IC50 values of 49.40 and 15.03 μM, respectively. In the early model, the combination therapy with meglumine antimoniate and nimodipine showed no parasites in the spleen or footpad of animals. The footpad thickness was significantly lower in mice treated with either nimodipine (1 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg) or amphotericin B compared to the control group in the established lesions model. However, no complete remission was observed in the footpad lesion of any of the treatment groups (nimodipine, amphotericin B, meglumine antimoniate, and combination therapy). Interpretation & conclusion: The effect of nimodipine was comparable to that of amphotericin B and meglumine antimoniate in early and established CL lesion models. Since nimodipine is more cost-effective than conventional therapies, our results merit further investigation in other animal models and voluntary human subjects.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0972-9062
العلاقة: http://www.jvbd.org/article.asp?issn=0972-9062;year=2020;volume=57;issue=1;spage=78;epage=84;aulastTest=; https://doaj.org/toc/0972-9062Test
DOI: 10.4103/0972-9062.308805
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/9f23604a37bb4f9ab2292d767f601005Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.9f23604a37bb4f9ab2292d767f601005
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:09729062
DOI:10.4103/0972-9062.308805