دورية أكاديمية

Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United StatesCentral MessagePerspective

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United StatesCentral MessagePerspective
المؤلفون: Yahya Alwatari, MD, Jad Khoraki, MD, Luke G. Wolfe, MS, Bhavishya Ramamoorthy, MD, Natalie Wall, MD, Christopher Liu, MD, Walker Julliard, MD, Carlos A. Puig, MD, Rachit D. Shah, MD
المصدر: JTCVS Open, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 385-398 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
LCC:Surgery
مصطلحات موضوعية: lung cancer, robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701, Surgery, RD1-811
الوصف: Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database. Methods: Hospital admissions for lobectomy or sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) using VATS or RATS in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patient and hospital characteristics, perioperative complications and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the surgical approach was independently associated with adverse outcomes. Results: There were 83,105 patients who had VATS (n = 65,375) or RATS (n = 17,710) for lobectomy (72.7% VATS) or sublobar resection (84.2% VATS). Utilization of RATS for lobectomy and sublobar resection increased from 19.2% to 34% and 7.3% to 22%, respectively. Mortality, LOS, and conversion rates were comparable. The cost was higher for RATS (P
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2666-2736
العلاقة: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273622003163Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-2736Test
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/90f4d43445c34c99b331092d78716f28Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.90f4d43445c34c99b331092d78716f28
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:26662736
DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014