دورية أكاديمية

Real-world community hospital hyperglycemia management in noncritically ill, type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between basal-bolus insulin and correctional insulin

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Real-world community hospital hyperglycemia management in noncritically ill, type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between basal-bolus insulin and correctional insulin
المؤلفون: Caiyun J. Yang, Chelsey Bourgeois, Elina Delgado, William Graham, Melissa A. Burmeister
المصدر: Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol 27 (2024)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Therapeutics. Pharmacology
LCC:Pharmacy and materia medica
مصطلحات موضوعية: basal-bolus insulin, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), inpatient glycemic management, pharmacy-led diabetes stewardship, correctional insulin, Therapeutics. Pharmacology, RM1-950, Pharmacy and materia medica, RS1-441
الوصف: PurposeThis study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two insulin regimens for inpatient hyperglycemia management: combination short-plus long-acting insulin (basal-bolus insulin regimen, BBIR) vs. short-acting insulin only (correctional insulin only regimen, CIOR).MethodsChart reviews identified noncritically ill patients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin injections. Study participants (N = 138) were divided into BBIR (N = 104) and CIOR (N = 34) groups. Data for the entire duration of each patient’s stay were analyzed.ResultsThe primary outcome of percent hyperglycemic days was higher in BBIR vs. CIOR (3.97 ± 0.33% vs. 1.22 ± 0.38%). The safety outcome of percent hypoglycemic events was not different between BBIR and CIOR (0.78 ± 0.22% vs. 0.53 ± 0.37%). Regarding secondary outcomes, the percentage of euglycemic days was lower in BBIR vs. CIOR (26.74 ± 2.97% vs. 40.98 ± 5.91%). Overall blood glucose (BG) and daily insulin dose were higher in BBIR vs. CIOR (231.43 ± 5.37 vs. 195.55 ± 6.25 mg/dL and 41.36 ± 3.07 vs. 5.02 ± 0.68 units, respectively). Insulin regimen-associated differences in hyperglycemia and daily insulin dose persisted after adjusting for covariates.ConclusionOur observations linking BBIR to worse glycemic outcomes differ from those reported in the randomized controlled Rabbit 2 and Rabbit 2 Surgery trials. This discrepancy can be partly explained by the fact that BBIR patients displayed worse glycemic baselines. Also, there was no diabetes stewardship team to monitor BG and modify insulin therapy, which is relevant since achieving euglycemia in BBIR patients requires more dose adjustments. This study highlights challenges with standard inpatient glycemic management and calls for further research assessing the benefits of pharmacist-led diabetes stewardship.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1482-1826
العلاقة: https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/jpps.2024.13074/fullTest; https://doaj.org/toc/1482-1826Test
DOI: 10.3389/jpps.2024.13074
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/48db4687f3964522bae8b23632c34977Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.48db4687f3964522bae8b23632c34977
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14821826
DOI:10.3389/jpps.2024.13074