دورية أكاديمية

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
المؤلفون: Chiu-Ming Chen, Jui-Jung Yang, Chia-Chun Wu
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 13, Iss 11, p 3203 (2024)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: degenerative disc disease (DDD), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), efficacy, two levels, Medicine
الوصف: Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are both considered to be efficacious surgical procedures for treating cervical spondylosis in patients with or without compression myelopathy. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of these procedures for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at two contiguous levels. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to 1 May 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes between CDA and ACDF in patients with two-level cervical DDD were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were surgical success rates and secondary surgery rates. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, as well as the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for the severity of cervical compression myelopathy and complication rates. Results: In total, eight studies (two RCTs, four retrospective studies, and two prospective studies) with a total of 1155 patients (CDA: 598; ACDF: 557) were included. Pooled results revealed that CDA was associated with a significantly higher overall success rate (OR, 2.710, 95% CI: 1.949–3.770) and lower secondary surgery rate (OR, 0.254, 95% CI: 0.169–0.382) compared to ACDF. In addition, complication rates were significantly lower in the CDA group than in the ACDF group (OR, 0.548, 95% CI: 0.326 to 0.919). CDA was also associated with significantly greater improvements in neck pain VAS than ACDF. No significant differences were found in improvements in the arm VAS, NDI, and JOA scores between the two procedures. Conclusions: CDA may provide better postoperative outcomes for surgical success, secondary surgery, pain reduction, and postoperative complications than ACDF for treating patients with two-level cervical DDD.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2077-0383
العلاقة: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/11/3203Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Test
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113203
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/43d7d2ec44a74ad2a1f0baced6fc0012Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.43d7d2ec44a74ad2a1f0baced6fc0012
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13113203