دورية أكاديمية

Challenging Endocrine Sensitivity of Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer with the Combination of Eribulin and Endocrine Therapy: The REVERT Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Challenging Endocrine Sensitivity of Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer with the Combination of Eribulin and Endocrine Therapy: The REVERT Study
المؤلفون: Ana López González, Sonia Del Barco Berrón, Isabel Grau, Maria Galan, Beatriz Castelo Fernández, Alfonso Cortés, Pedro Sánchez Rovira, Alejandro Martinez-Bueno, Xavier Gonzalez, Almudena García, Petra Gener, Leonardo Mina, Daniel Alcalá-López, Miguel Sampayo, Javier Cortés, José Manuel Pérez-Garcia, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Elena López-Miranda
المصدر: Cancers, Vol 14, Iss 23, p 5880 (2022)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: eribulin, luminal breast cancer, endocrine resistance, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: Background: Luminal advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients eventually progress on endocrine therapy. REVERT aimed to explore whether eribulin could restore endocrine sensitivity in a randomized, non-comparative phase II trial. Methods: Aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant patients with luminal ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive eribulin +/− AI. Patients were stratified by prior cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment. The primary endpoint was an investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST version 1.1 in the eribulin + AI arm. An interim analysis was planned with 11 evaluable patients according to a two-stage Simon design. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled (15 eribulin + AI arm; 7 eribulin arm). The trial was terminated early in March 2021, with eight (36.4%) patients still on treatment. ORR was 26.7% in the eribulin + AI arm (95% CI, 7.8–55.1%; p = 0.0541). In the eribulin arm, two (28.6%) patients had an objective response (95% CI, 3.7–71.0%). The difference between the study arms was not significant (p = 0.918). The addition of AI to eribulin also failed to show improvement in other efficacy endpoints. A significant interaction between the treatment arm and previous CDK4/6i treatment was observed for ORR (p = 0.018) and progression-free survival (p = 0.084). Overall, the toxicity profile was consistent with the known safety profile of eribulin. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion: Eribulin + AI does not seem to improve outcomes compared with eribulin monotherapy in patients with AI-resistant luminal ABC. This chemo–endocrine approach deserves further investigation after progression to CDK4/6i-based therapy.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2072-6694
العلاقة: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/23/5880Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694Test
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235880
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/ec068fc8a4c24e88ace17de4e7f2c65bTest
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.068fc8a4c24e88ace17de4e7f2c65b
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20726694
DOI:10.3390/cancers14235880