دورية أكاديمية

The added value of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance to predict positive genetic testing in clinically suspected Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The added value of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance to predict positive genetic testing in clinically suspected Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy
المؤلفون: Delhommeau, P, Marteau, L, Kyndt, F, Constant Dit Beaufils, AL, Warin-Fresse, K, Serfaty, JM, Rousseau, O, Karakachoff, M, Conan, E, Clero, S, Le Tourneau, T, Thollet, A, Trochu, JN, Probst, V, Piriou, N
المصدر: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging ; volume 22, issue Supplement_1 ; ISSN 2047-2404 2047-2412
بيانات النشر: Oxford University Press (OUP)
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, General Medicine
الوصف: Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy (CM) is an inherited disease due to LMNA gene mutation with particular phenotype that associates conduction disorders, frequent atrial fibrillation and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, with normal or altered ventricular systolic function. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) studies suggest frequent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) involving septal mid-myocardium. Aims To assess the added value of CMR to conventional clinical features of Lamin A/C CM for the prediction of a positive LMNA gene testing. Methods We performed a retrospective monocentric study in all index patients referred for genetic testing for a clinical suspicion of Lamin A/C CM. Clinical, ECG and imaging data including CMR at time of genetic testing in patients with a positive test (LMNA+) and patients without (LMNA-) were compared. The diagnostic performances of relevant parameters for the prediction of a positive LMNA gene testing were analyzed in several logistic regression models. Results 90 patients were included (55 LMNA+, 35 LMNA-).49% had significant left ventricular (LV) dilatation on echocardiography,57% had a LV ejection fraction (LVEF)<50%, 46% had a significant left atrial dilatation, and 17% had right ventricular dysfunction. None of these parameters were different comparing LMNA+ and LMNA- patients. LMNA+ patients had significantly more frequent familial history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or CM. There were no significant differences between LMNA+ and LMNA- patients in terms of conduction disorders, ventricular and supra-ventricular arrhythmias. The only significant difference on ECG was a more frequent abnormal R-wave progression in V1-V3 in LMNA+ patients (87.8% vs 39.4%, p < 0.001). 55 patients had a CMR (28/55 LMNA+, 27/35 LMNA-). The main reason for not performing CMR was the presence of cardiac implantable electronic device. LMNA+ patients had significantly more LGE than LMNA- (20/28 (71%) vs 9/27 ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.395
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.395Test
http://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/article-pdf/22/Supplement_1/jeaa356.395/36214680/jeaa356.395.pdfTest
حقوق: https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_modelTest
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.E9806DBA
قاعدة البيانات: BASE