دورية أكاديمية
Antibiotic prophylaxis for head and neck cancer surgery ; Антибиотикопрофилактика при хирургическом лечении опухолей головы и шеи
| العنوان: | Antibiotic prophylaxis for head and neck cancer surgery ; Антибиотикопрофилактика при хирургическом лечении опухолей головы и шеи |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | A. Guz O., D. Fatkullin M., A. Garev V., A. Zakharov S., M. Sokolova I., A. Alekseeva P., А. Гузь О., Д. Фаткуллин М., А. Гарев В., А. Захаров С., М. Соколова И., А. Алексеева П. |
| المصدر: | Head and Neck Tumors (HNT); Том 10, № 2 (2020); 54-60 ; Опухоли головы и шеи; Том 10, № 2 (2020); 54-60 ; 2411-4634 ; 2222-1468 ; 10.17650/2222-1468-2020-10-2 |
| بيانات النشر: | "ABV-press" Publishing House", LLC. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| المجموعة: | Head and neck tumors (HNT - E-Journal) / Опухоли головы и шеи |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | head and neck tumors, antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical wound infection, clean wounds, clean-contaminated wounds, lymphadenectomy, free flap, cephalosporins, clindamycin, опухоли головы и шеи, антибиотикопрофилактика, хирургическая раневая инфекция, чистые раны, условночистые раны, лимфаденэктомия, свободный лоскут, цефалоспорины, клиндамицин |
| الوصف: | This review analyzes the research data concerning the problem of antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) of wound infections after various surgeries for head and neck tumors. In patients with clean wounds, ABP should be used in exceptional cases only (for example, if the patient has any risk factors), otherwise it should be avoided. A short ABP course is recommended for patients with clean-contaminated wounds; however highrisk patients may require a prolonged course. There is some evidence of ABP efficacy in patients with non-contaminated wounds after cervical lymphadenectomy. When choosing a drug for ABP, a doctor should consider the site of surgery and the risk of wound contamination. The optimal drugs after head and neck surgeries include first- and second-generation cephalosporins, ampicillin in combination with sulbactam, metronidazole, and clindamycin. First- and second-generation cephalosporins in combination with metronidazole are preferable, but if the wound is infected with gram-positive bacteria, it is necessary to use clindamycin monotherapy. Reconstructive surgeries with a free flap require a short course of ABP with one of the following combinations: cefazolin + metronidazole, cefuroxime + metronidazole, or ampicillin + sulbactam; if the patient is allergic to beta-lactams, clindamycin can be used. Despite the availability of standard ABP regimens, a surgeon must apply a tailored approach when choosing an ABP regimen for each patient, taking into account risk factors and the volume of surgery. ; В настоящем обзоре проанализированы данные научной литературы по проблеме антибиотикопрофилактики (АБП) раневых инфекций при различных операциях по поводу опухолей головы и шеи. АБП при наличии чистой раны должна назначаться в исключительных случаях – при наличии факторов риска; в остальных ситуациях рекомендовано отказаться от нее. При условночистых хирургических ранах предпочтителен короткий курс АБП, но пациентам группы риска возможно назначение пролонгированного курса. Имеются данные об эффективности АБП при ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | Russian |
| العلاقة: | https://ogsh.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/527/424Test; Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68(6):394–424. DOI:10.3322/caac.21492.; Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2017 году. Под ред. В.В. Старинского, А.Д. Каприна, Г.В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена, 2018. 236 c. [State of oncological care in Russia in 2017. Ed. by А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Center, 2018. 236 p. (In Russ.)].; Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69(1):7–34. DOI:10.3322/caac.21551.; Gatta G., Botta L., Sánchez M.J. et al. Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: the EUROCARE-5 populationbased study. Eur J Cancer 2015;51(15):2130–43. DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.043.; Becker G.D., Parell G.J. Cefazolin prophylaxis in head and neck cancer surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979;88(2 Pt 1):183–6. DOI:10.1177/000348947908800206.; Herranz J., Sarandeses A., Fernández M.F. et al. Complications after total laryngectomy in nonradiated laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122(6):892–8. DOI:10.1016/S0194-59980070020-9.; Crippen M.M., Patel N., Filimonov A. et al. Association of smoking tobacco with complications in head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019;21(1):20–6. DOI:10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1176.; Lahtinen S., Koivunen P., Ala-Kokko T. et al. Quality of life after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck in patients with or without postoperative complications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275(10):2575–84. DOI:10.1007/s00405-018-5103-4.; Практическое руководство по антиинфекционной химиотерапии. Под ред. Л.С. Страчунского, Ю.Б. Белоусова, С.Н. Козлова. Доступно по: http://wwwTest. antibiotic.ru/ab/147-149.shtml. [A practical guide to anti-infectious chemotherapy. Ed. by L.S. Strachunsky, Yu.B. Belousov, S.N. Kozlov. Available at: http://www.antibiotic.ru/ab/147-149.shtmlTest. (In Russ.)].; Ortega G., Rhee D.S., Papandria D.J. et al. An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res 2012;174(1):33–8. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056.; Bratzler D.W., Dellinger E.P., Olsen K.M. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013;14(1):73–156. DOI:10.1089/sur.2013.9999.; Cruse P.J., Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980;60(1):27–40. DOI:10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42031-1.; Haley R.W., Culver D.H., Morgan W.M. et al. Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. A simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121(2):206–15. DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113991.; Olson M., O’Connor M., Schwartz M.L. Surgical wound infections. A 5-year prospective study of 20,193 wounds at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. Ann Surg 1984;199(3):253–9. DOI:10.1097/00000658-198403000-00001.; Culver D.H., Horan T.C., Gaynes R.P. et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91(3B):152S–7S. DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z.; Busch C.-J., Knecht R., Münscher A. et al. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273(9):2805–11. DOI:10.1007/s00405-015-3856-6.; Johnson J.T., Yu V.L., Myers E.N., Wagner R.L. An assessment of the need for gram-negative bacterial coverage in antibiotic prophylaxis for oncological head and neck surgery. J Infect Dis 1987;155(2):331–3. DOI:10.1093/infdis/155.2.331.; Murdoch D.A., Telfer M.R., Irvine G.H. Audit of antibiotic policy and wound infection in neck surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993;38(3):167–9.; Weber R.S., Callender D.L. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1992;155:16–20. DOI:10.1177/00034894921010S104.; Avenia N., Sanguinetti A., Cirocchi R. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in thyroid surgery: a preliminary multicentric Italian experience. Ann Surg Innov Res 2009;3:10. DOI:10.1186/1750-1164-3-10.; Carrau R.L., Byzakis J., Wagner R.L., Johnson J.T. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in uncontaminated neck dissections. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117(2):194–5. DOI:10.1001/archotol.1991.01870140082011.; Man L.-X., Beswick D.M., Johnson J.T. Antibiotic prophylaxis in uncontaminated neck dissection. Laryngoscope 2011;121(7):1473–7. DOI:10.1002/lary.21815.; Coskun H., Erisen L., Basut O. Factors affecting wound infection rates in head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123(3):328–33. DOI:10.1067/mhn.2000.105253.; Seven H., Sayin I., Turgut S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean neck dissections. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118(3):213–6. DOI:10.1258/002221504322927991.; Ketcham A.S., Bloch J.H., Crawford D.T. et al. The role of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in control of staphylococcal infections following cancer surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962;114:345–52.; Dor P., Klastersky J. Prophylactic antibiotics in oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal surgery for cancer: (a double-blind study). Laryngoscope 1973;83(12):1992–8. DOI:10.1288/00005537-197312000-00009.; Saginur R., Odell P.F., Poliquin J.F. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in head and neck cancer surgery. J Otolaryngol 1988;17(2):78-80.; Sepehr A., Gutierrez Santos B.-J., Chou C. et al. Antibiotics in head and neck surgery in the setting of malnutrition, tracheotomy, and diabetes. Laryngoscope 2009;119(3):549–53. DOI:10.1002/lary.20078.; Langerman A., Thisted R., Hohmann S., Howell M. Antibiotic and duration of perioperative prophylaxis predicts surgical site infection in head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;154(6):1054–63. DOI:10.1177/0194599816634303.; Simo R., French G. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck oncological surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14(2):55–61. DOI:10.1097/01.moo.0000193183.30687.d5.; Vila P.M., Zenga J., Jackson R.S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cleancontaminated head and neck surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;157(4):580–8. DOI:10.1177/0194599817712215.; Программа СКАТ (Стратегия Контроля Антимикробной Терапии) при оказании стационарной медицинской помощи. Российские клинические рекомендации. М., 2018. Доступно по: http://nasci.ru/?id=2880Test. [SATC (Strategy of Antimicrobial Therapy Control). Moscow, 2018. Available at: http://nasci.ru/?id=2880Test. (In Russ.)].; Профилактика инфекций области хирургического вмешательства. Клинические рекомендации. Н. Новгород: Ремедиум Приволжье, 2018. Доступно по: http://nasci.ru/?id=2260Test. [Prevention of Infections in the Area of Surgical Intervention. Nizhny Novgorod: Remedium Povolzh’e, 2018. Available at: http://nasci.ru/?id=2260Test. (In Russ.)].; Berríos-Torres S.I., Umscheid C.A., Bratzler D.W. et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017;152(8):784–91. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.; Fee W.E. Jr, Glenn M., Handen C., Hopp M.L. One day vs. two days of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 1984;94(5 Pt 1):612–4.; Johnson J.T., Schuller D.E., Silver F. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk head and neck surgery: one-day vs. five-day therapy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;95(5):554–7. DOI:10.1177/019459988609500506.; Bhathena H.M., Kavarana N.M. Prophylactic antibiotics administration head and neck cancer surgery with major flap reconstruction: 1-day cefoperazone versus 5-day cefotaxime. Acta Chir Plast 1998;40(2):36–40.; Liu S.A., Tung K.-C., Shiao J.-Y., Chiu Y.-T. Preliminary report of associated factors in wound infection after major head and neck neoplasm operations – does the duration of prophylactic antibiotic matter? J Laryngol Otol 2008;122(4):403–8. DOI:10.1017/S0022215107007529.; Righi M., Manfredi R., Farneti G. et al. Clindamycin/cefonicid in head and neck oncologic surgery: one-day prophylaxis is as effective as a three-day schedule. J Chemother 1995;7(3):216–20. DOI:10.1179/joc.1995.7.3.216.; Villanueva J.M., Araya I.C., Yanine N.M. Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis versus long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in major clean-contaminated maxillofacial surgery. Rev Chilena Infectol 2012;29(1):14–8. DOI:10.4067/s0716-10182012000100002.; Haidar Y.M., Tripathi P.B., Tjoa T. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cleancontaminated head and neck cases with microvascular free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 2018;40(2):417–27. DOI:10.1002/hed.24988.; https://ogsh.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/527Test |
| DOI: | 10.17650/2222-1468-2020-10-2-54-60 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2020-10-2-54-60Test https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2020-10-2Test https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492Test https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551Test https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.043Test https://doi.org/10.1177/000348947908800206Test https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-59980070020-9Test https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1176Test https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5103-4Test https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056Test |
| حقوق: | Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). ; Авторы, публикующие статьи в данном журнале, соглашаются на следующее:Авторы сохраняют за собой автороские права и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access). |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.D792AAA5 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.17650/2222-1468-2020-10-2-54-60 |
|---|