دورية أكاديمية

Systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): an evidence-based recommendation of the German interdisciplinary RCC guidelines group

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): an evidence-based recommendation of the German interdisciplinary RCC guidelines group
المؤلفون: Grünwald, V., Bergmann, L., Brehmer, B., Eberhardt, B., Kastrati, Karin, Gauler, T., Gehbauer, G., Gschwend, J., Johannsen, M., Klotz, T., Protzel, C., Schenck, M., Staehler, M.
المساهمون: Deutsche Krebshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen
المصدر: World Journal of Urology ; volume 40, issue 10, page 2381-2386 ; ISSN 1433-8726
بيانات النشر: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: Urology
الوصف: Purpose The treatment landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved dramatically in recent years. Within the German guideline committee for RCC we evaluated current medical treatments and gave recommendations. Methods A systematic review of published evidence for medical treatment of mRCC was performed (July 2016–August 2019) to cover the duration from last guideline update in 2016. Evidence was graded according to SIGN ( http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdfTest ). Recommendations were made on the basis of a nominal group work with consensus approach and included patient advocates and shareholder of the German RCC treatment landscape. Each recommendation was graded according to its strength as strong recommendation (A) or recommendation (B). Expert statements were given, where appropriate. Results Strong first-line recommendations (IA) exist for axitinib + pembrolizumab (all risk categories) and ipilimumab + nivolumab (intermediate or poor risk only). Axitinib + avelumab is a recommended first-line treatment across patients with any risk category (IB). In patients who are not candidates for immune check point inhibitor (ICI) combinations, targeted agents should be offered as an alternative treatment. Subsequent treatment after ICI-based combinations remain ill-defined and no standard of care can be formulated. Conclusion ICI-based combinations are the first-line standard of care and should be considered accordingly. There is an unmet medical need for pivotal studies that define novel standards in patients with failure of ICI-based combinations.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04015-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04015-1.pdf
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04015-1/fulltext.html
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04015-1Test
حقوق: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.BC49BFC
قاعدة البيانات: BASE