دورية أكاديمية
Influence of the Size of Cohorts in Adaptive Design for Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models: An Evaluation by Simulation for a Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model for a Biomarker in Oncology
| العنوان: | Influence of the Size of Cohorts in Adaptive Design for Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models: An Evaluation by Simulation for a Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model for a Biomarker in Oncology |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Lestini, Giulia, Dumont, Cyrielle, Mentré, France |
| المساهمون: | Infection, Anti-microbiens, Modélisation, Evolution (IAME (UMR_S_1137 / U1137)), Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), The research leading to these results has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement n° 115156, resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution |
| المصدر: | ISSN: 0724-8741. |
| بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists |
| سنة النشر: | 2015 |
| المجموعة: | Université Paris 13: HAL |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Fisher information matrix, adaptive design, nonlinear mixed effects model, optimal design, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, [SDV.SP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences, [SDV.IB]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, [SDV.BIBS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Quantitative Methods [q-bio.QM] |
| الوصف: | International audience ; Purpose: In this study we aimed to evaluate adaptive designs (ADs) by clinical trial simulation for a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in oncology and to compare them with one-stage designs, i.e. when no adaptation is performed, using wrong prior parameters.Methods: We evaluated two one-stage designs, ξ_0 and ξ_*, optimised for prior and true population parameters, Ψ_0 and Ψ*, and several ADs (two-, three- and five-stage). All designs had 50 patients. For ADs, the first cohort design was ξ_0. The next cohort design was optimised using prior information updated from the previous cohort. Optimal design was based on the determinant of the Fisher information matrix using PFIM. Design evaluation was performed by clinical trial simulations using data simulated from Ψ*. Results: Estimation results of two-stage ADs and ξ_* were close and much better than those obtained with ξ_0. The balanced two-stage AD performed better than two-stage ADs with different cohort sizes. Three- and five-stage ADs were better than two-stage with small first cohort, but not better than the balanced two-stage design.Conclusions: Two-stage ADs are useful when prior parameters are unreliable. In case of small first cohort, more adaptations are needed but these designs are complex to implement. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/26123680; inserm-01179444; https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01179444Test; https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01179444/documentTest; https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01179444/file/Manuscript_Lestini_HalInserm.pdfTest; PUBMED: 26123680; PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC5385211 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11095-015-1693-3 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-015-1693-3Test https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01179444Test https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01179444/documentTest https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01179444/file/Manuscript_Lestini_HalInserm.pdfTest |
| حقوق: | info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.B203CB44 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11095-015-1693-3 |
|---|