دورية أكاديمية

Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer
المؤلفون: Berwouts, Dieter, Olteanu, Luiza Ana Maria, Speleers, Bruno, Duprez, Frédéric, Madani, Indira, Vercauteren, Tom, De Neve, Wilfried, De Gersem, Werner
المصدر: Berwouts, Dieter; Olteanu, Luiza Ana Maria; Speleers, Bruno; Duprez, Frédéric; Madani, Indira; Vercauteren, Tom; De Neve, Wilfried; De Gersem, Werner (2016). Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer. Radiation Oncology, 11:52.
بيانات النشر: BioMed Central
سنة النشر: 2016
المجموعة: University of Zurich (UZH): ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive
مصطلحات موضوعية: Clinic for Radiation Oncology, 610 Medicine & health
الوصف: BACKGROUND This study investigates the implementation of a new intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) class solution in comparison to a 6-static beam step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (s-IMRT) for three-phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET-voxel-based dose-painting-by-numbers (DPBN) for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS We developed (18)F-FDG-PET-voxel intensity-based IMAT employing multiple arcs and compared it to clinically used s-IMRT DPBN. Three IMAT plans using (18)F-FDG-PET/CT acquired before treatment (phase I), after 8 fractions (phase II) and CT acquired after 18 fractions (phase III) were generated for each of 10 patients treated with 3 s-IMRT plans based on the same image sets. Based on deformable image registration (ABAS, version 0.41, Elekta CMS Software, Maryland Heights, MO), doses of the 3 plans were summed on the pretreatment CT using validated in-house developed software. Dosimetric indices in targets and organs-at-risk (OARs), biologic conformity of treatment plans set at ≤5 %, treatment quality and efficiency were compared between IMAT and s-IMRT for the whole group and for individual patients. RESULTS Doses to most organs-at-risk (OARs) were significantly better in IMAT plans, while target levels were similar for both types of plans. On average, IMAT ipsilateral and contralateral parotid mean doses were 14.0 % (p = 0.001) and 12.7 % (p < 0.001) lower, respectively. Pharyngeal constrictors D50% levels were similar or reduced with up to 54.9 % for IMAT compared to s-IMRT for individual patient cases. IMAT significantly improved biologic conformity by 2.1 % for treatment phases I and II. 3D phantom measurements reported an agreement of ≥95 % for 3 % and 3 mm criteria for both treatment modalities. IMAT delivery time was significantly shortened on average by 41.1 %. CONCLUSIONS IMAT implementation significantly improved the biologic conformity as compared to s-IMRT in adaptive dose-escalated DPBN treatments. The better OAR sparing and faster delivery highly improved the treatment efficiency.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1748-717X
العلاقة: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/130486/1/Intensity.pdfTest; info:pmid/27039294; urn:issn:1748-717X
DOI: 10.5167/uzh-130486
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0629-3
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-13048610.1186/s13014-016-0629-3Test
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/130486Test/
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/130486/1/Intensity.pdfTest
حقوق: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.9BCA4925
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
تدمد:1748717X
DOI:10.5167/uzh-130486