How to Treat Expert Judgment? With certainty it contains uncertainty!

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: How to Treat Expert Judgment? With certainty it contains uncertainty!
المؤلفون: Pasman, Hans J., Rogers, William J.
بيانات النشر: Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center
Texas &M University. Libraries
سنة النشر: 2019
المجموعة: Texas A&M University Digital Repository
مصطلحات موضوعية: expert elicitation
الوصف: Presentation ; To be acceptably safe one must identify the risks one is exposed to. It is uncertain whether the threat really will materialize, but determining the size and probability of the risk is also full of uncertainty. When performing an analysis and preparing for decision making under uncertainty, quite frequently failure rate data, information on consequence severity or on a probability value, yes, even on the possibility an event can or cannot occur is lacking. In those cases, the only way to proceed is to revert to expert judgment. Even in case historical data are available, but one should like to know whether these data still hold in the current situation, an expert can be asked about their reliability. Anyhow, expert elicitation comes with an uncertainty depending on the expert’s reliability, which becomes very visible when two or more experts give different answers or even conflicting ones. This is not a new problem, and very bright minds have thought how to tackle it. But so far, however, the topic has not been given much attention in process safety and risk assessment. The paper has a review character and will present various approaches with detailed explanation and examples.
نوع الوثيقة: report
وصف الملف: 22 pages; born digital; application/pdf
اللغة: English
العلاقة: Mary K O'Connor Process Safety Symposium. Proceedings 2019.; https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/193411Test
الإتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/193411Test
حقوق: IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED ; http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0Test/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.95EDC091
قاعدة البيانات: BASE