دورية أكاديمية
Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the French App Store: Assessment of Functionality and Quality (Preprint)
العنوان: | Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the French App Store: Assessment of Functionality and Quality (Preprint) |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Martinon, Prescilla, Saliasi, Ina, Bourgeois, Denis, Smenteck, Colette, Dussart, Claude, Fraticelli, Laurie, Carrouel, Florence |
المساهمون: | Parcours santé systémique (P2S), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon, Centre de recherche en gestion (CRG), École polytechnique (X)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
المصدر: | ISSN: 2291-5222 ; JMIR mHealth and uHealth ; https://univ-lyon1.hal.science/hal-03608273Test ; JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022, ⟨10.2196/35879⟩. |
بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD JMIR Publications |
سنة النشر: | 2022 |
المجموعة: | HAL Lyon 1 (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1) |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | mobile apps, behaviour change, diet, healthy food, nutrition, prevention, mhealth, lifestyle, [STAT]Statistics [stat], [STAT.ME]Statistics [stat]/Methodology [stat.ME] |
الوصف: | International audience ; Background: The global burden of disease attributes 20% of deaths to poor nutrition. Although hundreds of nutrition-related mobile apps have been created, and these have been downloaded by millions of users, the effectiveness of these technologies on the adoption of healthy eating has had mixedObjective: The aim of this study was to review which nutrition-related mobile apps are currently available on the French market and assess their quality.Methods: We screened apps on the Google Play Store and the French Apple App Store, from March 10 to 17, 2021, to identify those related to nutritional health. A shortlist of 15 apps was identified, and each was assessed using the French version of the Mobile App Rating Scale: 8 dietitians and nutritionists assessed 7 apps, and the remaining apps were randomly allocated to ensure 4 assessments per app. Intraclass correlation was used to evaluate interrater agreement. Means and standard deviations of scores for each section and each item were calculated.Results: The top scores for overall quality were obtained by Yazio - Régime et Calories (mean 3.84, SD 0.32), FeelEat (mean 3.71, SD 0.47), and Bonne App (mean 3.65, SD 0.09). Engagement scores ranged from a mean of 1.95 (SD 0.5) for iEatBetter: Journal alimentaire to a mean of 3.85 (SD 0.44) for FeelEat. Functionality scores ranged from a mean of 2.25 (SD 0.54) for Naor to a mean of 4.25 (SD 0.46) for Yazio. Aesthetics scores ranged from a mean of 2.17 (SD 0.34) for Naor to a mean of 3.88 (SD 0.47) for Yazio. Information scores ranged from a mean of 2.38 (SD 0.60) for iEatBetter to a mean of 3.73 (SD 0.29) for Yazio. Subjective quality scores ranged from a mean of 1.13 (SD 0.25) for iEatBetter to a mean of 2.28 (SD 0.88) for Compteur de calories FatSecret. Specificity scores ranged from a mean of 1.38 (SD 0.64) for iEatBetter to a mean of 3.50 (SD 0.91) for FeelEat. The app-specific score was always lower than the subjective quality score, which was always lower than the quality score, which was ... |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
اللغة: | English |
العلاقة: | hal-03608273; https://univ-lyon1.hal.science/hal-03608273Test; PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC8961341 |
DOI: | 10.2196/35879 |
الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.2196/35879Test https://univ-lyon1.hal.science/hal-03608273Test |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.852AFA30 |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
DOI: | 10.2196/35879 |
---|