دورية أكاديمية
Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review
| العنوان: | Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Wakam, Raphaël, Benoit, Aurélie, Mawussi, Kwamivi Bernardin, Gorin, Caroline |
| المساهمون: | Université Paris Cité (UPCité) |
| المصدر: | ISSN: 1996-1944 ; Materials ; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616Test ; Materials, 2022, 15 (5), pp.1933. ⟨10.3390/ma15051933⟩. |
| بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD MDPI |
| سنة النشر: | 2022 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | [SPI.MAT]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Materials, [PHYS.MECA.BIOM]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Biomechanics [physics.med-ph] |
| الوصف: | International audience ; Attachment systems (AS) enhance retention and stability by anchoring the overdentures to implants. Since 2002, the McGill consensus statement recommends the 2-implant-retained overdentures as the standard choice for edentulous mandible (2-IRMO). Considering the large number of AS available, it remains difficult for a practitioner to make a reasoned choice. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/Medline and carried out independently by three authors, on retention, wear, and maintenance of AS used clinically or in vitro specifically for 1- or 2-IRMO. The 45 selected studies include 14 clinical and 31 in vitro studies. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The initial retention force of the cylindrical system is higher than the ball system. The retention loss, related to the wear of the retention device, is responsible for the most common need of maintenance, requiring activation or replacement. Plastic retention devices wear out faster and more significantly than metal ones, implying a worse time behavior of cylindrical systems, but their maintenance rate is similar. Neither system appears categorically superior. Cylindrical systems provide higher initial retention than ball ones; this advantage reduces over time with wear without affecting their need for maintenance. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | hal-03797616; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616Test; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616/documentTest; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616/file/materials-15-01933-v3.pdfTest |
| DOI: | 10.3390/ma15051933 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051933Test https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616Test https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616/documentTest https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03797616/file/materials-15-01933-v3.pdfTest |
| حقوق: | info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.74FA0A53 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.3390/ma15051933 |
|---|