دورية أكاديمية
Comparison of recommendations for surveillance of advanced colorectal polyps: a systematic review of guidelines
| العنوان: | Comparison of recommendations for surveillance of advanced colorectal polyps: a systematic review of guidelines |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Parker, Jody, Gupta, Sunnia, Torkington, Jared, Dolwani, Sunil |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | Cardiff University: ORCA (Online Research @ Cardiff) |
| الوصف: | Background and Aim: Patients diagnosed with advanced colorectal lesions have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer. International polyp surveillance guidelines have recently been updated. The aim of this systematic review was to assess surveillance recommendations for advanced colorectal polyps and compare the patient, polyp, and colonoscopy quality factors considered in their recommendations. Methods: Guidelines with surveillance recommendations for colorectal polyps were identified. Databases searched included PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, TripPro, and guidelines identified by two blinded reviewers. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO and performed in line with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Six guidelines from the US Multi‐Society Task Force, British Society of Gastroenterology, Cancer Council Australia, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, and Asia‐Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening were included. The recommended surveillance interval of 3 years was consistent, but the criteria used for advanced polyps were variable. Polyp factors were the key determinant for when surveillance should be performed. Although all guidelines recognized their importance, the application of and evidence underlying patient characteristics and the quality of baseline colonoscopy were limited. All included guidelines were rated of average to high quality by the AGREE II instrument. Conclusion: Surveillance guidelines for advanced colorectal polyps are of good quality but limited by their underlying evidence. Standardization of definitions would be valuable for both research and clinical application. Better knowledge of colonoscopist quality indicators and patient factors is recommended to further economize surveillance recommendations, minimize patient risk, and achieve optimal outcomes without increasing pressure on services. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/157717/1/jgh.16157.pdfTest; Parker, Jody https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A035621W.htmlTest, Gupta, Sunnia, Torkington, Jared https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A215102M.htmlTest and Dolwani, Sunil https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A031553M.htmlTest orcid:0000-0002-3113-5472 orcid:0000-0002-3113-5472 2023. Comparison of recommendations for surveillance of advanced colorectal polyps: a systematic review of guidelines. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 38 (6) , pp. 854-864. 10.1111/jgh.16157 https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16157Test file https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/157717/1/jgh.16157.pdfTest |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.16157 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16157Test https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/157717Test/ https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/157717/1/jgh.16157.pdfTest |
| حقوق: | cc_by_nc_nd_4_0 |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.636BCB84 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.16157 |
|---|