دورية أكاديمية

Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
المؤلفون: Watanabe, Jun, Ichimasa, Katsuro, Kataoka, Yuki, Miki, Atsushi, Someko, Hidehiro, Honda, Munenori, Tahara, Makiko, Yamashina, Takeshi, Yeoh, Khay Guan, Kawai, Shigeo, Kotani, Kazuhiko, Sata, Naohiro
المساهمون: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
المصدر: Digestive Endoscopy ; volume 36, issue 5, page 533-545 ; ISSN 0915-5635 1443-1661
بيانات النشر: Wiley
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
الوصف: Objectives Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a critical risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM), which requires additional surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the impact of additional staining on estimating LNM is unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of additional staining on determining LNM in T1 CRC. Methods We searched five electronic databases. Outcomes were diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), assessed using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and interobserver agreement among pathologists for positive LVI, assessed using Kappa coefficients ( κ ). We performed a subgroup analysis of studies that simultaneously included a multivariable analysis for other risk factors (deep submucosal invasion, poor differentiation, and tumor budding). Results Among the 64 studies (18,097 patients) identified, hematoxylin–eosin (HE) and additional staining for LVI had pooled sensitivities of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.58) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.44–0.86), specificities of 0.88 (95% CI 0.78–0.94) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.62–0.86), and DORs of 6.26 (95% CI 3.73–10.53) and 6.47 (95% CI 3.40–12.32) for determining LNM, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the DOR of additional staining for LNM (DOR 5.95; 95% CI 2.87–12.33) was higher than that of HE staining (DOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.13–3.16) ( P = 0.01). Pooled κ values were 0.37 (95% CI 0.22–0.52) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.04–0.99) for HE and additional staining for LVI, respectively. Conclusion Additional staining for LVI may increase the DOR for LNM and interobserver agreement for positive LVI among pathologists.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1111/den.14691
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14691Test
حقوق: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.5F899985
قاعدة البيانات: BASE