دورية أكاديمية

Prospective evaluation of the tolerability and efficacy of niraparib dosing based on baseline body weight and platelet count: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT‐OV26/GOG‐3012 trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Prospective evaluation of the tolerability and efficacy of niraparib dosing based on baseline body weight and platelet count: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT‐OV26/GOG‐3012 trial
المؤلفون: Mirza, Mansoor R., González‐Martín, Antonio, Graybill, Whitney S., O’Malley, David M., Gaba, Lydia, Stephanie Yap, Oi Wah, Guerra, Eva M., Rose, Peter G., Baurain, Jean‐François, Ghamande, Sharad A., Denys, Hannelore, Prendergast, Emily, Pisano, Carmela, Follana, Philippe, Baumann, Klaus, Calvert, Paula M., Korach, Jacob, Li, Yong, Malinowska, Izabela A., Gupta, Divya, Monk, Bradley J.
المساهمون: Post-Finasteride Syndrome Foundation
المصدر: Cancer ; volume 129, issue 12, page 1846-1855 ; ISSN 0008-543X 1097-0142
بيانات النشر: Wiley
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
الوصف: Background The PRIMA/ENGOT‐OV26/GOG‐3012 (NCT02655016) trial was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen of niraparib for first‐line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Methods In the phase 3 PRIMA trial, patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy ( N = 733) were initially treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) regimen of 300 mg once daily. Subsequently, the protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD: 200 mg once daily in patients with baseline body weight < 77 kg or baseline platelet count < 150,000/µL, and 300 mg once daily in all other patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by starting dose. Results Overall, 475 (64.8%) patients were assigned to an FSD (niraparib, n = 317; placebo, n = 158) and 258 (35.2%) were assigned to an ISD (niraparib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88). Efficacy in patients who received FSD or ISD was similar for the overall (FSD hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46–0.76] vs. ISD HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48–0.98]) and the homologous recombination–deficient (FSD HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30–0.64] vs. ISD HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22–0.72]) populations. In patients with low body weight/platelet count, rates of grades ≥3 and 4 hematologic treatment‐emergent adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions were lower for those who received ISD than for those who received FSD. Conclusions In PRIMA, similar dose intensity, similar efficacy, and improved safety were observed with the ISD compared with the FSD regimen.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34706
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34706Test
حقوق: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Test/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.51E7C509
قاعدة البيانات: BASE