دورية أكاديمية
International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
| العنوان: | International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Danne, Thomas, Nimri, Revital, Battelino, Tadej, Bergenstal, Richard M, Close, Kelly L, DeVries, J Hans, Garg, Satish, Heinemann, Lutz, Hirsch, Irl, Amiel, Stephanie A, Beck, Roy, Bosi, Emanuele, Buckingham, Bruce, Cobelli, Claudio, Dassau, Eyal, Doyle, Francis J, Heller, Simon, Hovorka, Roman, Jia, Weiping, Jones, Tim, Kordonouri, Olga, Kovatchev, Boris, Kowalski, Aaron, Laffel, Lori, Maahs, David, Murphy, Helen R, Nørgaard, Kirsten, Parkin, Christopher G, Renard, Eric, Saboo, Banshi, Scharf, Mauro, Tamborlane, William V, Weinzimer, Stuart A, Phillip, Moshe |
| بيانات النشر: | American Diabetes Association //dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1600 Diabetes Care |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| المجموعة: | Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Blood Glucose, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Clinical Trials as Topic, Consensus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, International Agencies, Physicians, Reference Standards, Research Personnel |
| الوصف: | Measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has been the traditional method for assessing glycemic control. However, it does not reflect intra- and interday glycemic excursions that may lead to acute events (such as hypoglycemia) or postprandial hyperglycemia, which have been linked to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), either from real-time use (rtCGM) or intermittently viewed (iCGM), addresses many of the limitations inherent in HbA1c testing and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Although both provide the means to move beyond the HbA1c measurement as the sole marker of glycemic control, standardized metrics for analyzing CGM data are lacking. Moreover, clear criteria for matching people with diabetes to the most appropriate glucose monitoring methodologies, as well as standardized advice about how best to use the new information they provide, have yet to be established. In February 2017, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address these issues. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations and represents the current understanding of how CGM results can affect outcomes. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | Print; application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/273212Test |
| DOI: | 10.17863/CAM.20219 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.20219Test https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/273212Test |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.44619D31 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.17863/CAM.20219 |
|---|