دورية أكاديمية
Impact of different mammography systems on artificial intelligence performance in breast cancer screening
| العنوان: | Impact of different mammography systems on artificial intelligence performance in breast cancer screening |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | de Vries, Clarisse F., Colosimo, Samantha J., Staff, Roger T., Dymiter, Jaroslaw A., Yearsley, Joseph, Dinneen, Deirdre, Boyle, Moragh, Harrison, David J., Anderson, Lesley A., Lip, Gerald, Black, Corri, Murray, Alison D., Wilde, Katie, Blackwood, James D., Butterly, Claire, Zurowski, John, Eilbeck, Jon, McSkimming, Colin |
| المصدر: | de Vries , C F , Colosimo , S J , Staff , R T , Dymiter , J A , Yearsley , J , Dinneen , D , Boyle , M , Harrison , D J , Anderson , L A , Lip , G , Black , C , Murray , A D , Wilde , K , Blackwood , J D , Butterly , C , Zurowski , J , Eilbeck , J & McSkimming , C 2023 , ' Impact of different mammography systems on artificial intelligence performance in breast cancer screening ' , Radiology: .... |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Breast, Screening, Mammography, Computer applications: detection/diagnosis, Neoplasms: primary, Technology assessment |
| الوصف: | Artificial intelligence (AI) tools may assist breast screening mammography programs, but limited evidence supports their generalizability to new settings. This retrospective study used a 3-year dataset (April 1, 2016-March 31, 2019) from a U.K. regional screening program. The performance of a commercially available breast screening AI algorithm was assessed with a prespecified and site-specific decision threshold to evaluate whether its performance was transferable to a new clinical site. The dataset consisted of women (aged approximately 50-70 years) who attended routine screening, excluding self-referrals, those with complex physical requirements, those who had undergone a previous mastectomy, and those who underwent screening that had technical recalls or did not have the four standard image views. In total, 55916 screening attendees (mean age, 60 years ± 6 [SD]) met the inclusion criteria. The prespecified threshold resulted in high recall rates (48.3%, 21929 of 45444), which reduced to 13.0% (5896 of 45444) following threshold calibration, closer to the observed service level (5.0%, 2774 of 55916). Recall rates also increased approximately threefold following a software upgrade on the mammography equipment, requiring per-software version thresholds. Using software-specific thresholds, the AI algorithm would have recalled 277 of 303 (91.4%) screen-detected cancers and 47 of 138 (34.1%) interval cancers. AI performance and thresholds should be validated for new clinical settings before deployment, while quality assurance systems should monitor AI performance for consistency. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | https://research-portal.st-andrews.ac.uk/en/researchoutput/impact-of-different-mammography-systems-on-artificial-intelligence-performance-in-breast-cancer-screeningTest(e130106f-ece9-4a1b-8256-ba83d0bea591).html |
| DOI: | 10.1148/ryai.220146 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220146Test https://research-portal.st-andrews.ac.uk/en/researchoutput/impact-of-different-mammography-systems-on-artificial-intelligence-performance-in-breast-cancer-screeningTest(e130106f-ece9-4a1b-8256-ba83d0bea591).html https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/27836/1/DeVries_etal_RAI_Impact_Of_Different_AAM.pdfTest https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245180Test/ https://europepmc.org/article/MED/37293340Test |
| حقوق: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.41A68BDA |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1148/ryai.220146 |
|---|