دورية أكاديمية
Strategies for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training across Europe: results of a qualitative study
| العنوان: | Strategies for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training across Europe: results of a qualitative study |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Sofia Ramiro, Francisca Sivera, Brigitte Michelsen, Kim Lauper, Maddalena Larosa, Alexandre Sepriano, Ladislav Šenolt, Alessia Alunno, Paul Studenic, Ana Maria Gherghe, Catherine Haines, Russka Shumnalieva, Aurélie Najm, Cecilia Mercieca, Peter Korsten, Ledio Collaku, Samir Mehmedagić, Ivan Pajen, Tue Kragstrup, Liis Puis, Laura Kuusalo, Claire Daien, Mangel Zsolt, Richard Conway, Mira Merashli, Julija Zepa, Snezana M. Perchinkova, Victoria Sadovici-Bobeica, Marloes von Onna, Olga Brzezińska, Anton Povzun, Ivan Jeremic, Ulrika Ursinyova, Blaž Burja, Diego Benavent, Aikaterina Chatzidionysiou, Yesim Ozguler, Yuzaiful Yusof, Olena Zimba |
| المصدر: | RMD Open, Vol 6, Iss 2 (2020) |
| بيانات النشر: | BMJ Publishing Group HAL CCSD BMJ |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Medicine, demo, archeo |
| الوصف: | Objectives To gain insight into current methods and practices for the assessment of competences during rheumatology training, and to explore the underlying priorities and rationales for competence assessment.Methods We used a qualitative approach through online focus groups (FGs) of rheumatology trainers and trainees, separately. The study included five countries—Denmark, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom. A summary of current practices of assessment of competences was developed, modified and validated by the FGs based on an independent response to a questionnaire. A prioritising method (9 Diamond technique) was then used to identify and justify key assessment priorities.Results Overall, 26 participants (12 trainers, 14 trainees) participated in nine online FGs (2 per country, Slovenia 1 joint), totalling 12 hours of online discussion. Strong nationally (the Netherlands, UK) or institutionally (Spain, Slovenia, Denmark) standardised approaches were described. Most groups identified providing frequent formative feedback to trainees for developmental purposes as the highest priority. Most discussions identified a need for improvement, particularly in developing streamlined approaches to portfolios that remain close to clinical practice, protecting time for quality observation and feedback, and adopting systematic approaches to incorporating teamwork and professionalism into assessment systems.Conclusion This paper presents a clearer picture of the current practice on the assessment of competences in rheumatology in five European countries and the underlying rationale of trainers’ and trainees’ priorities. This work will inform EULAR Points-to-Consider for the assessment of competences in rheumatology training across Europe. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001183Test |
| DOI: | 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001183 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001183Test |
| حقوق: | undefined |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.378772F4 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001183 |
|---|