التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Provider perspectives on the provision of safe, equitable, trauma-informed care for intimate partner violence survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study |
| المؤلفون: |
Williams, Emma E., Arant, Kaetlyn R., Leifer, Valia P., Balcom, Mardi Chadwick, Levy-Carrick, Nomi C., Lewis-O’Connor, Annie, Katz, Jeffrey N. |
| المصدر: |
BMC Women's Health ; volume 21, issue 1 ; ISSN 1472-6874 |
| بيانات النشر: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| سنة النشر: |
2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, General Medicine |
| الوصف: |
Background Early research suggests the COVID-19 pandemic worsened intimate partner violence (IPV) in the US. In particular, stay-at-home orders and social distancing kept survivors in close proximity to their abusers and restricted access to resources and care. We aimed to understand and characterize the impact of the pandemic on delivery of IPV care in Boston. Methods We conducted individual interviews with providers of IPV care and support in the Greater Boston area, including healthcare workers, social workers, lawyers, advocates, and housing specialists, who continued to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using thematic analysis, we identified themes describing the challenges and opportunites providers faced in caring for survivors during the pandemic. Results Analysis of 18 interviews yielded four thematic domains, encompassing 18 themes and nine sub-themes. Thematic analysis revealed that the pandemic posed an increased threat to survivors of IPV by exacerbating external stressors and leading to heightened violence. On a system level, the pandemic led to widespread uncertainty, strained resources, amplified inequities, and loss of community. On an individual level, COVID-19 restrictions limited survivors’ abilities to access resources and to be safe, and amplified pre-existing inequities, such as limited technology access. Those who did not speak English or were immigrants experienced even more difficulty accessing resources due to language and/or cultural barriers. To address these challenges, providers utilized video and telephone interactions, and stressed the importance of creativity and cooperation across different sectors of care. Conclusions While virtual care was essential in allowing providers to care for survivors, and also allowed for increased flexibility, it was not a panacea. Many survivors faced additional obstacles to care, such as language barriers, unequal access to technology, lack of childcare, and economic insecurity. Providers addressed these barriers by tailoring services ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12905-021-01460-9 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12905-021-01460-9.pdf |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12905-021-01460-9/fulltext.html |
| الإتاحة: |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01460-9Test |
| حقوق: |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.2BDBA8F7 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |
