دورية أكاديمية

Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion
المؤلفون: Ulusoy, Özgür İ. A., Görgül, Güliz
المصدر: Australian Endodontic Journal ; volume 39, issue 2, page 66-72 ; ISSN 1329-1947 1747-4477
بيانات النشر: Wiley
سنة النشر: 2011
المجموعة: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
الوصف: This study aimed to compare the effects of different irrigants on root dentine microhardness, erosion and smear layer removal. A total of 72 root dentine slices were divided into six groups, according to the final irrigants used: Group 1: 17% ethylenediamine tetra‐acetic acid (EDTA) + 2.5% NaOCl, Group 2: 7% maleic acid (MA) + 2.5% sodium hypochloride (NaOCl), Group 3: 1.3% NaOCl + mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), Group 4: Smear Clear + 2.5% NaOCl, Group 5: 5% NaOCl, Group 6: saline. Vickers microhardness values were measured before and after treatment. In total, 42 root‐halves were prepared for scanning electron microscope to evaluate the amount of smear and erosion in the coronal, middle and apical thirds. Data were analysed using two‐way anova , Duncan and two‐proportion z ‐tests. Maleic acid showed the greatest reduction in dentine microhardness ( P < 0.05), followed by EDTA and MTAD. EDTA, maleic acid, MTAD and Smear Clear removed smear layer efficiently in the coronal and middle thirds of root canal. However, in the apical region, maleic acid showed more efficient removal of the smear layer than the other irrigants ( P < 0.05).
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00291.x
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00291.xTest
حقوق: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vorTest
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.2B585422
قاعدة البيانات: BASE