دورية أكاديمية

Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility.
المؤلفون: Pashayan, Nora, Lyratzopoulos, Georgios, Mathur, Raj
بيانات النشر: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
BMC Health Serv Res
سنة النشر: 2011
المجموعة: Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Support Techniques, Embryo Transfer, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Gonadotropins, Health Care Costs, Humans, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Artificial, Live Birth, Models, Statistical, Pregnancy, Treatment Outcome
الوصف: BACKGROUND: In unexplained and mild male factor subfertility, both intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) are indicated as first line treatments. Because the success rate of IUI is low, many couples failing IUI subsequently require IVF treatment. In practice, it is therefore important to examine the comparative outcomes (live birth-producing pregnancy), costs, and cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF, compared with primary offer of IUI followed by IVF for couples failing IUI. METHODS: Mathematical modelling was used to estimate comparative clinical and cost effectiveness of either primary offer of one full IVF cycle (including frozen cycles when applicable) or "IUI + IVF" (defined as primary IUI followed by IVF for IUI failures) to a hypothetical cohort of subfertile couples who are eligible for both treatment strategies. Data used in calculations were derived from the published peer-reviewed literature as well as activity data of local infertility units. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness ratios for IVF, "unstimulated-IUI (U-IUI) + IVF", and "stimulated IUI (S-IUI) + IVF" were 12,600 pounds sterling, 13,100 pound sterling and 15,100 pound sterling per live birth-producing pregnancy respectively. For a hypothetical cohort of 100 couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility, compared with primary offer of IVF, 6 cycles of "U-IUI + IVF" or of "S-IUI + IVF" would cost an additional 174,200 pounds sterling and 438,000 pounds sterling, representing an opportunity cost of 54 and 136 additional IVF cycles and 14 to 35 live birth-producing pregnancies respectively. CONCLUSION: For couples with unexplained and mild male factor subfertility, primary offer of a full IVF cycle is less costly and more cost-effective than providing IUI (of any modality) followed by IVF. ; RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/licenseTest which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: text/xml; application/msword; application/pdf
اللغة: English
العلاقة: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/237677Test
الإتاحة: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/237677Test
حقوق: Pashayan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.1FBA5773
قاعدة البيانات: BASE