دورية أكاديمية

Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization
المؤلفون: Michiels, Steven, Barragan Montero, Ana Maria, Souris, Kevin, Poels, Kenneth, Crijns, Wouter, Lee, John Aldo, Sterpin, Edmond, Nuyts, Sandra, Haustermans, Karin, Depuydt, Tom
المساهمون: UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie
المصدر: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 128, no. 1, p. 161-166 (2018)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier Scientific Publishers
سنة النشر: 2018
المجموعة: DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles)
مصطلحات موضوعية: Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Hematology, 3D printing, Head-and-neck cancer, IMPT, Oropharyngeal cancer, Proton therapy, Range shifting
الوصف: BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of superficial lesions requires pre-absorbing range shifter (RS) to deliver the more shallow spots. RS air gap minimization is important to avoid spot size degradation, but remains challenging in complex geometries such as in head-and-neck cancer (HNC). In this study, clinical endpoints were investigated for patient-specific bolus and for conventional RS solutions, making use of a Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine for IMPT optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 5 oropharyngeal cancer patients, IMPT spot maps were generated using beamlets calculated with MC. The plans were optimized for three different RS configurations: 3D printed on-skin bolus, snout- and nozzle-mounted RS. Organ-at-risk (OAR) doses and late toxicity probabilities were compared between all configuration-specific optimized plans. RESULTS: The use of bolus reduced the mean dose to all OARs compared to snout and nozzle-mounted RS. The contralateral parotid gland and supraglottic larynx received on average 2.9Gy and 4.2Gy less dose compared to the snout RS. Bolus reduced the average probability for xerostomia by 3.0%. For dysphagia, bolus reduced the probability by 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of the dosimetric advantage of patient-specific bolus shows significant reductions compared to conventional RS solutions for xerostomia and dysphagia probability. These results motivate the development of a patient-specific bolus solution in IMPT for HNC.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0167-8140
1879-0887
العلاقة: boreal:194129; http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194129Test; info:pmid/28951008; urn:ISSN:0167-8140; urn:EISSN:1879-0887
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.006
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.006Test
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194129Test
حقوق: info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.1F25D87
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
الوصف
تدمد:01678140
18790887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.006