دورية أكاديمية

Randomized phase 2 study: Elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Randomized phase 2 study: Elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM
المؤلفون: Jakubowiak, Andrzej, Offidani, Massimo, Pégourie, Brigitte, De La Rubia, Javier, Garderet, Laurent, Laribi, Kamel, Bosi, Alberto, MARASCA, Roberto, Laubach, Jacob, Mohrbacher, Ann, Carella, Angelo Michele, Singhal, Anil K., Tsao, L. Claire, Lynch, Mark, Bleickardt, Eric, Jou, Ying Ming, Robbins, Michael, Palumbo, Antonio
المساهمون: Jakubowiak, Andrzej, Offidani, Massimo, Pégourie, Brigitte, De La Rubia, Javier, Garderet, Laurent, Laribi, Kamel, Bosi, Alberto, Marasca, Roberto, Laubach, Jacob, Mohrbacher, Ann, Carella, Angelo Michele, Singhal, Anil K., Tsao, L. Claire, Lynch, Mark, Bleickardt, Eric, Jou, Ying Ming, Robbins, Michael, Palumbo, Antonio
سنة النشر: 2016
المجموعة: Archivio della ricerca dell'Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia (Unimore: IRIS)
مصطلحات موضوعية: Biochemistry, Immunology, Medicine (all), Hematology, Cell Biology
الوصف: In this proof-of-concept, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) received elotuzumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone (EBd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Bd) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Two-sided 0.30 significance level was specified (80% power, 103 events) to detect hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on all randomized patients and all treated patients, respectively. Of 152 randomized patients (77 EBd, 75 Bd), 150 were treated (75 EBd, 75 Bd). PFS was greater with EBd vs Bd (HR, 0.72; 70% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.88; stratified log-rank P 5 .09); median PFS was longer with EBd (9.7 months) vs Bd (6.9 months). In an updated analysis, EBd-treated patients homozygous for the high-affinity FcγRIIIa allele had median PFS of 22.3 months vs 9.8 months in EBd-treated patients homozygous for the low-affinity allele. ORR was 66% (EBd) vs 63% (Bd). Very good partial response or better occurred in 36% of patients (EBd) vs 27% (Bd). Early OS results, based on 40 deaths, revealed an HR of 0.61 (70% CI, 0.43-0.85). To date, 60 deaths have occurred (28 EBd, 32 Bd). No additional clinically significant adverse events occurred with EBd vs Bd. Grade 1/2 infusion reaction rate was low (5% EBd) and mitigated with premedication. In patients with RRMM, elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory antibody, appears to provide clinical benefit without added clinically significant toxicity when combined with Bd vs Bd alone. Registered to ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01478048.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: STAMPA
اللغة: English
العلاقة: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/27091875; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000378335900014; volume:127(23); firstpage:2833; lastpage:2840; numberofpages:8; journal:BLOOD; http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1112426Test; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84974633304; http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/127/23/2833Test
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-694604
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-694604Test
http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1112426Test
http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/127/23/2833Test
حقوق: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.1156BEED
قاعدة البيانات: BASE