The differential impact of scientific quality, bibliometric factors, and social media activity on the influence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis
| العنوان: | The differential impact of scientific quality, bibliometric factors, and social media activity on the influence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Antonio Vélez García-Nieto, Jesús Gay-Mimbrera, Francisco Gómez-García, Marcelino González-Padilla, Patricia Alcalde Mellado, Beatriz Isla-Tejera, José Luis Hernández Romero, Macarena Aguilar-Luque, Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas, Beatriz Maestre-López, Juan Ruano, Pedro J. Carmona-Fernandez |
| المصدر: | PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 1, p e0191124 (2018) PLoS ONE |
| بيانات النشر: | Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2018. |
| سنة النشر: | 2018 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Computer and Information Sciences, Systematic Reviews, Twitter, Immunology, Applied psychology, Scopus, Social Sciences, lcsh:Medicine, Bibliometrics, Research and Analysis Methods, Autoimmune Diseases, 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Sociology, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Psoriasis, Social media, lcsh:Science, Scientific Publishing, Altmetrics, Multidisciplinary, Impact factor, 05 social sciences, lcsh:R, Social Communication, Biology and Life Sciences, Research Assessment, Communications, Systematic review, Social Networks, Meta-analysis, Citation Analysis, Clinical Immunology, lcsh:Q, Clinical Medicine, 0509 other social sciences, 050904 information & library sciences, Citation, Psychology, Social Media, Network Analysis, Research Article |
| الوصف: | Researchers are increasingly using on line social networks to promote their work. Some authors have suggested that measuring social media activity can predict the impact of a primary study (i.e., whether or not an article will be highly cited). However, the influence of variables such as scientific quality, research disclosures, and journal characteristics on systematic reviews and meta-analyses has not yet been assessed. The present study aims to describe the effect of complex interactions between bibliometric factors and social media activity on the impact of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis (PROSPERO 2016: CRD42016053181). Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Altmetrics, which consider Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ mention counts as well as Mendeley and SCOPUS readers, and corresponding article citation counts from Google Scholar were obtained for each article. Metadata and journal-related bibliometric indices were also obtained. One-hundred and sixty-four reviews with available altmetrics information were included in the final multifactorial analysis, which showed that social media and impact factor have less effect than Mendeley and SCOPUS readers on the number of cites that appear in Google Scholar. Although a journal's impact factor predicted the number of tweets (OR, 1.202; 95% CI, 1.087-1.049), the years of publication and the number of Mendeley readers predicted the number of citations in Google Scholar (OR, 1.033; 95% CI, 1.018-1.329). Finally, methodological quality was related neither with bibliometric influence nor social media activity for systematic reviews. In conclusion, there seems to be a lack of connectivity between scientific quality, social media activity, and article usage, thus predicting scientific success based on these variables may be inappropriate in the particular case of systematic reviews. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1932-6203 4201-6053 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::de3748db51b35b120ea5a0819710fbf7Test http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5788350?pdf=renderTest |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....de3748db51b35b120ea5a0819710fbf7 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 19326203 42016053 |
|---|