Biomechanical evaluation of proximal hamstring repair: all-suture anchor versus titanium suture anchor

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Biomechanical evaluation of proximal hamstring repair: all-suture anchor versus titanium suture anchor
المؤلفون: Mark P. Cote, Joshua B. Baldino, Alexander Otto, Katherine Coyner, Knut Beitzel, Augustus D. Mazzocca, Alyssa M. DiCosmo, Andreas B. Imhoff, Julian Mehl, Elifho Obopilwe
المصدر: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Orthodontics, hip, business.industry, proximal hamstring avulsion, Biomechanics, Article, biomechanics, Tendon, ddc, titanium suture anchor, all-suture anchor, medicine.anatomical_structure, medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, ddc:610, business, Hamstring, Suture anchors, proximal hamstring repair
الوصف: Background: Proximal hamstring avulsions are severe tendon injuries and are commonly sports-related. Open and endoscopic techniques as well as different anchor configurations have already been described for proximal hamstring repair. Novel all-suture anchors have been developed to provide decreased bone loss during placement and reduced occupied bone volume when compared with titanium suture anchors. Hypothesis: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions repaired with all-suture anchors will demonstrate equal load to failure and comparable displacement under cyclic loading when compared with titanium suture anchors. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions were created in 18 paired cadaveric specimens (mean ± SD age, 63.0 ± 10.4 years). Either all-suture anchors or titanium suture anchors were used for repair. Cyclic loading from 10 to 125 N at 1 Hz was performed for 1500 cycles with a material testing machine. Displacement was assessed along anterior and posterior aspects of the tendon repair with optical tracking. Specimens were loaded to failure at a rate of 120 mm/min. Displacement, load to failure, and repair construct stiffness were compared between matched pairs with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were determined by Spearman rho analysis. Results: The all-suture anchors showed significantly higher load-to-failure values when compared with the titanium anchor repairs (799.64 ± 257.1 vs 573.27 ± 89.9 N; P = .008). There was no significant difference in displacement between all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors at the anterior aspect (6.60 ± 2.2 vs 5.49 ± 1.1 mm; P = .26) or posterior aspect (5.87 ± 2.08 vs 5.23 ± 1.37 mm; P = .678) of the repaired hamstring tendons. Conclusion: All-suture anchors demonstrated similar displacement and superior load to failure when compared with titanium suture anchors. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that all-suture anchors are an equivalent alternative to titanium suture anchors for proximal hamstring avulsion repair.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d789371c4375feceb5edba40957e5b4aTest
https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/files/77305/2325967119892925.pdfTest
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....d789371c4375feceb5edba40957e5b4a
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE