A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission
| العنوان: | A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Jacinta L. Johnson, Lauren Corre, Deanna Mill, Amy Page, Michael Bakker |
| المساهمون: | Mill, Deanna, Bakker, Michael, Corre, Lauren, Page, Amy, Johnson, Jacinta |
| المصدر: | International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 28:663-666 |
| بيانات النشر: | Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | medicine.medical_specialty, government.form_of_government, medication error, Pharmaceutical Science, Pharmacy, inpatient, incident report, Antiparkinson Agents, Tertiary Care Centers, 03 medical and health sciences, Patient Admission, 0302 clinical medicine, medicine, Humans, Medication Errors, 030212 general & internal medicine, Dosing, Medical diagnosis, Retrospective Studies, Inpatients, Risk Management, business.industry, Data Collection, 030503 health policy & services, Health Policy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Parkinson Disease, Medication administration, Inpatient setting, Hospitalization, Emergency medicine, Hospital admission, Parkinson’s disease, government, voluntary reporting, Case note, 0305 other medical science, business, Reporting system, Incident report |
| الوصف: | Objective To compare the frequency and type of inpatient Parkinson’s medication errors reported through an incident report system versus those identified through retrospective case note review in a tertiary teaching hospital. Methods A search of inpatient medication-related incident reports identified those pertaining to Parkinson’s medication. A discharge diagnoses search identified admissions for patients with Parkinson’s disease over the same time period. A retrospective case note and incident report review were performed to describe and quantify medication-related events. Key findings Substantially, more medication-related problems were identified via case note review (n = 805) versus incident reporting system (n = 19). A significantly different pattern of error types was identified utilising case note review versus incident reporting, with case note review more likely to identify delayed dosing, and incident reports more likely to identify wrong dose or formulation administered errors. Conclusions Retrospective incident report and case note review can be used to characterise medication administration errors encountered in an inpatient setting. Incident report review alone is insufficient in estimating error rates, and dual data collection methods should be used. |
| تدمد: | 2042-7174 0961-7671 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::beb683e980b093785f55d91a4feb3c36Test https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12668Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....beb683e980b093785f55d91a4feb3c36 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 20427174 09617671 |
|---|