A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Three Continuous Glucose Monitors

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Three Continuous Glucose Monitors
المؤلفون: David M. Nathan, Hui Zheng, El-Khatib Firas H, Steven Russell, Katherine McKeon, Edward R. Damiano
المصدر: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 8:699-708
بيانات النشر: SAGE Publications, 2014.
سنة النشر: 2014
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, Aging, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Continuous glucose monitoring, business.industry, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biomedical Engineering, Reproducibility of Results, Bioengineering, Original Articles, Circadian Rhythm, Surgery, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Internal Medicine, medicine, Humans, Female, Glucose monitors, business, Nuclear medicine
الوصف: Background: The effectiveness and safety of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) is dependent on their accuracy and reliability. The objective of this study was to compare 3 CGMs in adult and pediatric subjects with type 1 diabetes under closed-loop blood-glucose (BG) control. Twenty-four subjects (12 adults) with type 1 diabetes each participated in one 48-hour closed-loop BG control experiment. Methods: Venous plasma glucose (PG) measurements obtained every 15 minutes (4657 values) were paired in time with corresponding CGM glucose (CGMG) measurements obtained from 3 CGMs (FreeStyle Navigator, Abbott Diabetes Care; G4 Platinum, Dexcom; Enlite, Medtronic) worn simultaneously by each subject. Results: The Navigator and G4 Platinum (G4) had the best overall accuracy, with an aggregate mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of all paired points of 12.3 ± 12.1% and 10.8 ± 9.9%, respectively. Both had lower MARDs of all paired points than Enlite (17.9 ± 15.8%, P < .005). Very large errors (MARD > 50%) were less common with the G4 (0.5%) than with the Enlite (4.3%, P = .0001) while the number of very large errors with the Navigator (1.4%) was intermediate between the G4 and Enlite ( P = .1 and P = .06, respectively). The average MARD for experiments in adolescent subjects were lower than in adult subjects for the Navigator and G4, while there was no difference for Enlite. All 3 devices had similar reliability. Conclusions: A comprehensive head-to-head-to-head comparison of 3 CGMs revealed marked differences in both accuracy and precision. The Navigator and G4 were found to outperform the Enlite in these areas.
تدمد: 1932-2968
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b85fb5d37209c09931d328765e2cb6efTest
https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814532203Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....b85fb5d37209c09931d328765e2cb6ef
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE