Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial
المؤلفون: Parmida Zarei, Aviva G. Nathan, Wen Wan, Elbert S. Huang, Aaron N. Winn, Michael J. O'Grady, Alexa Minc, M. Reza Skandari
المصدر: Diabetes Care. 41:1227-1234
بيانات النشر: American Diabetes Association, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, Pediatrics, medicine.medical_specialty, endocrine system diseases, Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics, Cost effectiveness, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, medicine.medical_treatment, Population, Monitoring, Ambulatory, 030209 endocrinology & metabolism, Hypoglycemia, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, law, Diabetes mellitus, Internal Medicine, medicine, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, 030212 general & internal medicine, education, Aged, Glycemic, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, education.field_of_study, Type 1 diabetes, business.industry, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, nutritional and metabolic diseases, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, business
الوصف: OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the societal cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using multiple insulin injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In the Multiple Daily Injections and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes (DIAMOND) trial, 158 patients with T1D and HbA1c ≥7.5% were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to CGM or control. Participants were surveyed at baseline and 6 months. Within-trial and lifetime cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted. A modified Sheffield T1D policy model was used to simulate T1D complications. The main outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS Within the 6-month trial, the CGM group had similar QALYs to the control group (0.462 ± 0.05 vs. 0.455 ± 0.06 years, P = 0.61). The total 6-month costs were $11,032 (CGM) vs. $7,236 (control). The CGM group experienced reductions in HbA1c (0.60 ± 0.74% difference in difference [DiD]), P < 0.01), the daily rate of nonsevere hypoglycemia events (0.07 DiD, P = 0.013), and daily test strip use (0.55 ± 1.5 DiD, P = 0.04) compared with the control group. In the lifetime analysis, CGM was projected to reduce the risk of T1D complications and increase QALYs by 0.54. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $98,108 per QALY for the overall population. By extending sensor use from 7 to 10 days in a real-world scenario, the ICER was reduced to $33,459 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS For adults with T1D using multiple insulin injections and still experiencing suboptimal glycemic control, CGM is cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY, with improved glucose control and reductions in nonsevere hypoglycemia.
تدمد: 1935-5548
0149-5992
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ab656e8641eed19b999f72553b51a9aaTest
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1821Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....ab656e8641eed19b999f72553b51a9aa
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE