Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes
المؤلفون: Narvada Jugnee, Vanessa Moscardó, Monika Reddy, Nick Oliver, Parizad Avari
المساهمون: DexCom Inc.
المصدر: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 14:567-574
بيانات النشر: SAGE Publications, 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, Type 1 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, business.industry, Continuous glucose monitoring, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, Biomedical Engineering, hypoglycemia episodes, Bioengineering, Hypoglycemia, medicine.disease, Internal medicine, Diabetes mellitus, glycemic variability, Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Medicine, continuous glucose monitoring, 1111 Nutrition and Dietetics, Risk type, business, Glycemic
الوصف: Background: The I-HART CGM study has shown that real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has greater beneficial impact on hypoglycemia than intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes at high risk (Gold score ≥4 or recent severe hypoglycemia using insulin injections). In this subanalysis, we present the impact of rtCGM and iscCGM on glycemic variability (GV). Methods: Forty participants were recruited to this parallel group study. Following two weeks of blinded rtCGM (DexcomG4), participants were randomized to rtCGM (Dexcom G5; n = 20) or iscCGM (Freestyle Libre; n = 20) for eight weeks. An open-extension phase enabled participants on rtCGM to continue for a further eight weeks and those on iscCGM to switch to rtCGM over this period. Glycemic variability measures at baseline, 8- and 16-week endpoints were compared between groups. Results: At the eight-week endpoint, between-group differences demonstrated significant reduction in several GV measures with rtCGM compared to iscCGM (GRADE%hypoglycemia, index of glycemic control [IGC], and average daily risk range [ADRR]; P < .05). Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring reduced mean average glucose and glycemic variability percentage and GRADE%hyperglycemia compared with rtCGM ( P < .05). At 16 weeks, the iscCGM group switching to rtCGM showed significant improvement in GRADE%hypoglycemia, personal glycemic status, IGC, and ADRR. Conclusion: Our data suggest most, but not all, GV measures improve with rtCGM compared with iscCGM, particularly those measures associated with the risk of hypoglycemia. Selecting appropriate glucose monitoring technology to address GV in this high-risk cohort is important to minimize the risk of glucose extremes and severe hypoglycemia. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03028220
تدمد: 1932-2968
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a15bd2ae31ed18908fb7ec1d94aa2e3dTest
https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819867688Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....a15bd2ae31ed18908fb7ec1d94aa2e3d
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE