Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases
المؤلفون: Suzette J. Bielinski, Bijan J. Borah, Liewei Wang, Ricardo L. Rojas, Sue L. Visscher, Richard M. Weinshilboum, Kristi M. Swanson, Jennifer L. St. Sauver, Zhen Wang, Ye Zhu, Larry J. Prokop
المصدر: Genetics in Medicine
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, economic evaluation, Cost effectiveness, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Design elements and principles, Disease, 030105 genetics & heredity, 03 medical and health sciences, cardiovascular disease, Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases, Humans, Medicine, Precision Medicine, Disease management (health), Intensive care medicine, cost-effectiveness, Genetics (clinical), Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9, pharmacogenomics, business.industry, Clopidogrel, Pharmacogenomic Testing, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19, 030104 developmental biology, disease management, Cardiovascular Diseases, Pharmacogenetics, Pharmacogenomics, Economic evaluation, Systematic Review, Warfarin, VKORC1, business
الوصف: Purpose To examine the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of implementing pharmacogenomics (PGx) in cardiovascular disease (CVD) care. Methods We conducted a systematic review using multiple databases from inception to 2018. The titles and abstracts of cost-effectiveness studies on PGx-guided treatment in CVD care were screened, and full texts were extracted. Results We screened 909 studies and included 46 to synthesize. Acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation were the predominantly studied conditions (59%). Most studies (78%) examined warfarin–CYP2C9/VKORC1 or clopidogrel–CYP2C19. A payer’s perspective was commonly used (39%) for cost calculations, and most studies (46%) were US-based. The majority (67%) of the studies found PGx testing to be cost-effective in CVD care, but cost-effectiveness varied across drugs and conditions. Two studies examined PGx panel testing, of which one examined pre-emptive testing strategies. Conclusion We found mixed evidence on the cost-effectiveness of PGx in CVD care. Supportive evidence exists for clopidogrel–CYP2C19 and warfarin–CYP2C9/VKORC1, but evidence is limited in other drug–gene combinations. Gaps persist, including unclear explanation of perspective and cost inputs, underreporting of study design elements critical to economic evaluations, and limited examination of PGx panel and pre-emptive testing for their cost-effectiveness. This review identifies the need for further research on economic evaluations of PGx implementation.
تدمد: 1098-3600
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9cb83812973ef071c4aa01b358736fe4Test
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0667-yTest
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....9cb83812973ef071c4aa01b358736fe4
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE