Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Knowledge‐based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
المؤلفون: Michael A. Dyer, H Xu, Yin Zhang, Suhong Yu, H Zhen, Minh Tam Truong, Xin Zhang, Ariel E. Hirsch
المصدر: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Knowledge based planning, medicine.medical_treatment, Mean squared prediction error, stereotactic radiosurgery, Radiosurgery, Standard deviation, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, Stereotactic radiotherapy, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Cyberknife, Linear regression, medicine, Radiation Oncology Physics, Humans, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Instrumentation, Retrospective Studies, Mathematics, Radiation, business.industry, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Radiotherapy Dosage, knowledge‐based planning, Conformity index, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, stereotactic radiotherapy, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Nuclear medicine, business
الوصف: PURPOSE To develop a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHODS Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (req_PTV ) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (req_Vi , where Vi = V10% , V20% … V120% ). To evaluate the model's predictability, a fourfold cross-validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V50% . The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GMpred - GMclin and fractional ΔV50% = (V50%pred - V50%clin )/V50%clin ) and a coefficient of determination, R2 . Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. RESULTS Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross-validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV50% . The R2 for the linear fit between req_PTV and req_vi was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V10% to V120% ; particularly, R2 = 0.995 for V50% and R2 = 0.997 for V100% . Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P
تدمد: 1526-9914
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::941d1221bf3f2c4c2568d163f96b8679Test
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13173Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....941d1221bf3f2c4c2568d163f96b8679
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE