Efficacy and safety of AIR inhaled insulin compared to insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in a 6-month, randomized, noninferiority trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Efficacy and safety of AIR inhaled insulin compared to insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in a 6-month, randomized, noninferiority trial
المؤلفون: Masako Nakano, Zvonko Milicevic, Eric Renard, Xuejing Mao, Angel L Comulada, Nadeem Rais, David M. Webb
المصدر: Diabetes technologytherapeutics. 11
سنة النشر: 2009
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, medicine.medical_treatment, Insulin Antibodies, Vital Capacity, Insulin Glargine, law.invention, Body Mass Index, Endocrinology, Pharmacotherapy, Randomized controlled trial, law, Diabetes mellitus, Internal medicine, Forced Expiratory Volume, Administration, Inhalation, medicine, Insulin lispro, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Glycated Hemoglobin, Type 1 diabetes, Insulin Lispro, business.industry, Insulin glargine, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, Insulin, Long-Acting, Medical Laboratory Technology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Treatment Outcome, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Safety, business, Body mass index, medicine.drug
الوصف: Patients with type 1 diabetes may prefer features of AIR inhaled insulin (developed by Alkermes, Inc. [Cambridge, MA] and Eli Lilly and Company [Indianapolis, IN]; AIR is a registered trademark of Alkermes, Inc.) over insulin injection, but the two methods need to be compared for efficacy and safety.This multicenter, 6-month, parallel-group, noninferiority trial had 500 patients with type 1 diabetes randomized to morning doses of basal insulin glargine plus either preprandial injectable insulin lispro or preprandial AIR insulin. We hypothesized that AIR insulin is noninferior (upper bound of the 95% confidence intervalor = 0.4%) to insulin lispro for change-from-baseline hemoglobin A1C (A1C).Baseline A1C was 7.95 +/- 0.08% for both groups. At end point, A1C was lower with insulin lispro than with AIR insulin by 0.27% (95% confidence interval 0.11, 0.43; P0.001). Noninferiority of AIR insulin to insulin lispro was not demonstrated, but similar percentages of patients in each group achieved A1C7.0% (P = 0.448). Overall daily blood glucose was similar between groups at baseline (P = 0.879) and end point (P = 0.161). Two-hour postprandial blood glucose change from baseline was significantly (P0.001) higher with AIR insulin (20.77 +/- 4.33 mg/dL at 3 months and 15.85 +/- 3.08 mg/dL at end point) than with insulin lispro (3.29 +/- 4.14 mg/dL at 3 months and 1.67 +/- 2.91 mg/dL at end point). Overall hypoglycemia was similar between treatment groups (P = 0.355). The AIR insulin group had greater decrease in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide at end point (P = 0.020) and greater incidence of cough (P = 0.024) and dyspnea (P = 0.030). Body weight decreased in the AIR insulin group and increased in the insulin lispro group.Insulin lispro provided lower A1C than AIR insulin, but the difference may not be clinically relevant.
تدمد: 1557-8593
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::83de79cdbb68fd0615b725c555d9b276Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19772445Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....83de79cdbb68fd0615b725c555d9b276
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE