Balloon pulmonary angioplasty: an additional treatment option to improve the prognosis of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty: an additional treatment option to improve the prognosis of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
المؤلفون: Kazuhiko Nakayama, Yu Taniguchi, Noriaki Emoto, Yutaka Okita, Kenji Okada, Kazuya Miyagawa, Hiroto Kinutani, K Hirata, Toshiro Shinke
المصدر: EuroIntervention. 10:518-525
بيانات النشر: Europa Digital & Publishing, 2014.
سنة النشر: 2014
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, endocrine system, Cardiac output, medicine.medical_specialty, Hypertension, Pulmonary, medicine.medical_treatment, Endarterectomy, Balloon, Angioplasty, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Arterial Pressure, In patient, Aged, Retrospective Studies, business.industry, Mortality rate, food and beverages, Treatment options, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Treatment Outcome, medicine.anatomical_structure, Chronic Disease, Vascular resistance, Cardiology, Female, Vascular Resistance, Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, Pulmonary Embolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Angioplasty, Balloon
الوصف: Aims To evaluate the efficacy and safety of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in patients with non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) using the results of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for operable patients as a reference, and annotate the role of BPA in the management of CTEPH. Methods and results Data from 53 CTEPH patients were collected retrospectively. Twenty-four operable patients underwent PEA, and 29 non-operable patients underwent BPA. Patients who underwent BPA showed improved mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac output (39.4±6.9 to 21.3±5.6 mmHg, 763±308 to 284±128 dyn·s-1·cm-5, 3.47±0.80 to 4.26±1.15 L/min, respectively); patients who received PEA showed similar efficacy (44.4±11.0 to 21.6±6.7 mmHg, 781±278 to 258±125 dyn·s-1·cm-5, 3.35±1.11 to 4.44±1.58 L/min, respectively). The mortality rates of BPA and PEA patients were 3.4% and 8.3%, respectively. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of BPA for non-operable cases were similar to those achieved using PEA for operable cases. BPA could be an additional treatment option for non-operable CTEPH patients, and most CTEPH patients can be satisfactorily treated by BPA or PEA.
تدمد: 1774-024X
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::83c1472e97450ccdf2d88922a316134fTest
https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv10i4a89Test
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....83c1472e97450ccdf2d88922a316134f
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE