Left lateral segment liver volume is not correlated with anthropometric measures

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Left lateral segment liver volume is not correlated with anthropometric measures
المؤلفون: Lisa M. McElroy, Andrew S. Barbas, Brian I. Shaw, Carl L. Berg, Fides R. Schwartz, Daniele Marin, Mariya L. Samoylova, Debra L. Sudan, Kadiyala V. Ravindra
المصدر: HPB. 23:1830-1836
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Liver volume, Coefficient of variation, Liver transplantation, End Stage Liver Disease, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, Living Donors, medicine, Humans, Child, Hepatology, Multivariable linear regression, business.industry, Whole liver, Gastroenterology, Anthropometry, Liver Transplantation, Liver, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Cardiology, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Lateral segment, Right liver, business
الوصف: Background Liver transplantation is definitive therapy for end stage liver disease in pediatric patients. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with the left lateral segment (LLS) is often a feasible option. However, the size of LLS is an important factor in donor suitability – particularly when the recipient weighs less than 10 kg. In the present study, we sought to define a formula for estimating left lateral segment volume (LLSV) in potential LLS donors. Methods We obtained demographic and anthropometric measurements on 50 patients with Computed Tomography (CT) scans to determine whole liver volume (WLV), right liver volume (RLV), and LLSV. We performed univariable and multivariable linear regression with backwards stepwise variable selection (p Results Our study found that previously reported anthropometric and demographics variables correlated with volume were significantly associated with WLV and RLV. On univariable analysis, no demographic or anthropometric measures were correlated with LLSV. On multivariable analysis, LLSV was poorly predicted by the final model (R2 = 0.10, Coefficient of Variation [CV] = 42.2) relative to WLV (R2 = 0.33, CV = 18.8) and RLV (R2 = 0.41, CV = 15.8). Conclusion Potential LLS living donors should not be excluded based on anthropometric data: all potential donors should be evaluated regardless of their size.
تدمد: 1365-182X
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::818c6c607473ae9f368384be5366bed6Test
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.018Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....818c6c607473ae9f368384be5366bed6
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE