Subjective assessment reported by patients shows differences between single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, systematic review and meta-analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Subjective assessment reported by patients shows differences between single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, systematic review and meta-analysis
المؤلفون: Irene Herruzo, David Varillas-Delgado, Carlos Martín-Saborido, Antonio Maestro
المصدر: Scientific Reports
RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
instname
Scientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
DDFV. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
بيانات النشر: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Joint Instability, medicine.medical_specialty, Knee Joint, Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Physiology, Science, Anterior cruciate ligament, medicine.medical_treatment, Knee Injuries, Lachman test, Article, Arthroscopy, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Double bundle, Humans, Medicine, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, 030222 orthopedics, Multidisciplinary, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Significant difference, Recovery of Function, 030229 sport sciences, Functional recovery, medicine.anatomical_structure, Meta-analysis, Physical therapy, Anatomy, business, human activities
الوصف: To determine the functional recovery, active reincorporation, and anteroposterior and rotational stability of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using arthroscopy techniques with simple-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB). The following databases were searched: PubMed, Embase (Elsevier platform), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley platform), Web of Science, and CINAHL. Level I and II studies involving anterior cruciate ligament arthroscopy were included in the search. Records were screened by title and abstract and assessed the risk of bias of selected studies. Meta-analyses using RevMan 5.3 software were conducted on the following outcomes: knee functionality, objective measurements of knee stability, rotational knee stability and knee anterior stability, sports reincorporation, and subjective assessments. Twenty-four studies of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis (1707 patients) for Lysholm score, Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score, KT-1000/2000, Lachman test, Objective IKDC score, and Pivot-Shift test. A return to pre-injury level showed a significant decrease in the Lysholm score (mean difference, − 0.99; 95% CI − 1.71 to − 0.40; P = 0.007) and Tegner score (mean difference, − 0.07; 95% CI, − 0.13 to − 0.01; P = 0.02) at DB reconstruction, similar to the knee functionality outcome of the subjective IKDC score (mean difference − 1.42; 95% CI − 2.46 to − 0.38; P = 0.007). There is no clear or significant difference in clinical stability and knee function or in sports incorporation with the true difference occurring in the subjective assessment.
تدمد: 2045-2322
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7de593f0663cb472e3b1853aa22e7d21Test
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94868-0Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....7de593f0663cb472e3b1853aa22e7d21
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE