Diffusion coefficient through the blood-aqueous barrier using a standard protocol

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Diffusion coefficient through the blood-aqueous barrier using a standard protocol
المؤلفون: E. Leite, Michael Diestelhorst, B Heintz, J. A. Van Best, J B del Castillo, Rainer Schalnus, L F Liesenborghs
المصدر: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 80:356-362
بيانات النشر: BMJ, 1996.
سنة النشر: 1996
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Blood-Aqueous Barrier, Diffusion, Paired difference test, Analytical chemistry, Fluorophotometry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, chemistry.chemical_compound, Healthy volunteers, Blood plasma, medicine, Humans, Fluorescein, Intraocular Pressure, Aged, business.industry, Age Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Biological Transport, Middle Aged, Fluoresceins, Sensory Systems, Surgery, Ophthalmology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, chemistry, Case-Control Studies, Standard protocol, Feasibility Studies, Female, Time integral, business, Research Article
الوصف: AIMS/BACKGROUND: Comparison of the diffusion coefficient through the blood-aqueous barrier of healthy volunteers measured in different cities with identical fluorophotometers using a standardised protocol. METHODS: Healthy volunteers aged between 20 and 70 years were studied in seven European cities. The fluorescein concentration in the anterior segment of each eye was measured with a commercial scanning fluorophotometer 30 and 40 minutes after intravenous fluorescein. The decay of non-protein bound fluorescein concentration in blood plasma was determined with the use of three blood samples taken at 7, 15, and 55 minutes after injection. The diffusion coefficient through the blood-aqueous barrier was calculated from the ratio between the fluorescein concentration in the anterior chamber and the time integral of non-protein bound fluorescein concentration in plasma using specially developed software. RESULTS: The mean values of the diffusion coefficient (SD) (X10(-4) min-1) were 4.76 (1.51) (n = 20, Brussels), 5.48 (2.33) (n = 17, Coimbra), 3.47 (2.09) (n = 12, Cologne), 6.09 (2.77) (n = 21, Frankfurt), 3.85 (1.59) (n = 11, Ghent), 4.99 (1.69) (n = 23, Leiden), and 4.87 (1.05) (n = 20, Madrid). The values between centres were similar (Kruskal-Wallis test p > 0.05) except for Cologne and Frankfurt (p = 0.013). No differences were found when repeating measurements (four centres, interval time 1-8 months, Wilcoxon paired test p > 0.39). CONCLUSION: The diffusion coefficients had similar values and standard deviations. The concerted action demonstrated the usefulness of a standardised protocol.
تدمد: 0007-1161
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::62aa2f450332ac318c2a9353fd841159Test
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.80.4.356Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....62aa2f450332ac318c2a9353fd841159
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE