Utility and Practicality of Multi-level Sectioning and Upfront Unstained Slide Cutting in Head and Neck Biopsies: A Critical Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Utility and Practicality of Multi-level Sectioning and Upfront Unstained Slide Cutting in Head and Neck Biopsies: A Critical Analysis
المؤلفون: Mario W. Saab-Chalhoub, James S. Lewis
المصدر: Head and Neck Pathology. 13:613-617
بيانات النشر: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: 0301 basic medicine, Larynx, medicine.medical_specialty, Pathology, Biopsy, H&E stain, Grocott's methenamine silver stain, Stain, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Humans, Medicine, Retrospective Studies, Original Paper, Staining and Labeling, business.industry, Pharynx, Histology, Sinonasal Tract, stomatognathic diseases, 030104 developmental biology, medicine.anatomical_structure, Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Neoplasms, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, business, Nuclear medicine
الوصف: Upfront interval sectioning (cutting unstained slides between H&E levels) is used at our institution for biopsies at all sites except the gastrointestinal tract. Very limited data exists in the literature for the need for interval sectioning, and we are aware of no data at all for the head and neck. Biopsies from the larynx, oral cavity, pharynx, and sinonasal tract at our institution have had 5 levels cut. Levels 1, 3, and 5 or levels 2 and 5 had been stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), depending on the subsite, and the remaining slides saved for possible later use. We retrospectively evaluated the use of unstained slides at these sites for clinical utility and efficiency by analyzing 3 years of cases from 1/1/2014 to 12/30/2016. A cutoff of 10% utilization was considered justification for continued upfront unstained slide cutting. We collected 706 larynx, 572 oral cavity, 184 pharynx, and 85 sinonasal tract biopsies over 3 years. The overall rate of unstained slide usage was 18.2%. Usage rates were significantly different by site: 7.8% (55/706) for larynx, 21.9% (125/572) for oral cavity, 30.6% (26/85) for sinonasal tract and 40.8% (75/184) for pharynx (p
تدمد: 1936-0568
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::411a28266b0ec74c809eb574ba41ad3eTest
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01016-2Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....411a28266b0ec74c809eb574ba41ad3e
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE