The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Further Findings From the DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Further Findings From the DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial
المؤلفون: Katrina J. Ruedy, Danielle Hessler, Roy W. Beck, William H. Polonsky
المصدر: Diabetes Care. 40:736-741
بيانات النشر: American Diabetes Association, 2017.
سنة النشر: 2017
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, Research design, medicine.medical_specialty, endocrine system diseases, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 030209 endocrinology & metabolism, Anxiety, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Quality of life, Randomized controlled trial, law, Diabetes mellitus, Internal Medicine, medicine, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Prospective Studies, 030212 general & internal medicine, Prospective cohort study, Aged, Glycemic, Glycated Hemoglobin, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, Type 1 diabetes, business.industry, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, nutritional and metabolic diseases, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Hypoglycemia, Distress, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Linear Models, Quality of Life, Physical therapy, Female, business, Biomarkers, Follow-Up Studies
الوصف: OBJECTIVE Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control, but data are inconclusive about its influence on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the impact of 24 weeks of CGM use on QOL in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who use multiple daily insulin injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS DIAMOND (Multiple Daily Injections and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes) was a prospective randomized trial that assessed CGM versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) only in 158 adults with poorly controlled T1D. At baseline and study end, participants completed QOL measures that assessed overall well-being (WHO-5), health status (EQ-5D-5L), diabetes distress (DDS), hypoglycemic fear (worry subscale of the HFS-II), and hypoglycemic confidence (HCS). At study end, CGM participants completed the CGM Satisfaction Survey. Linear regression analyses compared treatment group changes in QOL outcomes over time. Associations between CGM satisfaction and change in QOL outcomes and in glycemic control indices were assessed. RESULTS The CGM group demonstrated a greater increase in hypoglycemic confidence (P = 0.01) and a greater decrease in diabetes distress (P = 0.01) than the SMBG group. No significant group differences in well-being, health status, or hypoglycemic fear were observed. CGM satisfaction was not significantly associated with glycemic changes but was associated with reductions in diabetes distress (P < 0.001) and hypoglycemic fear (P = 0.02) and increases in hypoglycemic confidence (P < 0.001) and well-being (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS CGM contributes to significant improvement in diabetes-specific QOL (i.e., diabetes distress, hypoglycemic confidence) in adults with T1D, but not with QOL measures not specific to diabetes (i.e., well-being, health status). CGM satisfaction was associated with most of the QOL outcomes but not with glycemic outcomes.
تدمد: 1935-5548
0149-5992
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::18b3a274731d79e2ff1080f35c8ad1bdTest
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0133Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....18b3a274731d79e2ff1080f35c8ad1bd
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE