Criterion Validity of a Field-Based Assessment of Aerobic Capacity in Wheelchair Rugby Athletes
| العنوان: | Criterion Validity of a Field-Based Assessment of Aerobic Capacity in Wheelchair Rugby Athletes |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Tom A W Paulson, Sonja de Groot, Keith Tolfrey, Vicky L. Goosey-Tolfrey |
| المساهمون: | SMART Movements (SMART), Physiology, AMS - Rehabilitation & Development |
| المصدر: | International journal of sports physiology and performance, 16(9), 1341-1346. HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC Goosey-Tolfrey, V L, Groot, S D, Tolfrey, K & Paulson, T A W 2021, ' Criterion Validity of a Field-Based Assessment of Aerobic Capacity in Wheelchair Rugby Athletes ', International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1341-1346 . https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2020-0517Test International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(9), 1341-1346. Human Kinetics Publishers Inc. |
| بيانات النشر: | HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | ACTIVITY PROFILES, FITNESS, PREDICTION, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, EXERCISE, PARAMETERS, Endurance, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Wheelchair, Oxygen Consumption, Paralympic, Statistics, Criterion validity, Humans, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Treadmill, Equivalence (measure theory), Mathematics, endurance, Fitness testing, Profiling, VO2 max, 030229 sport sciences, PERFORMANCE, Confidence interval, Test (assessment), Wheelchairs, Athletes, fitness testing, Exercise Test, Rugby, profiling, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Student's t-test, TREADMILL |
| الوصف: | Purpose: To confirm whether peak aerobic capacity determined during laboratory testing could be replicated during an on-court field-based test in wheelchair rugby players. Methods: Sixteen wheelchair rugby players performed an incremental speed-based peak oxygen uptake () test on a motorized treadmill (TM) and completed a multistage fitness test (MFT) on a basketball court in a counterbalanced order, while spirometric data were recorded. A paired t test was performed to check for systematic error between tests. A Bland–Altman plot for illustrated the agreement between the TM and MFT results and how this related to the boundaries of practical equivalence. Results: No significant differences between mean were reported (TM: 1.85 [0.63] vs MFT: 1.81 [0.63] L·min−1; P = .33). Bland–Altman plot for suggests that the mean values are in good agreement at the group level; that is, the exact 95% confidence limits for the ratio systematic error (0.95–1.02) are within the boundaries of practical equivalence (0.88–1.13) showing that the group average TM and MFT values are interchangeable. However, consideration of the data at the level of the individual athlete suggests that the TM and MFT results were not interchangeable because the 95% ratio limits of agreement either coincide with the boundaries of practical equivalence (upper limit) or fall outside (lower limit). Conclusions: Results suggest that the MFT provides a suitable test at a group level with this cohort of wheelchair rugby players for the assessment of (range 0.97–3.64 L·min–1), yet caution is noted for interchangeable use of values between tests for individual players. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1555-0265 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1712087fdd12f8de8d99328d9ef020f5Test https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0517Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....1712087fdd12f8de8d99328d9ef020f5 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15550265 |
|---|