Using argumentation in expert’s debate to analyze multi-criteria group decision making method results
| العنوان: | Using argumentation in expert’s debate to analyze multi-criteria group decision making method results |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Gang Kou, K. Samuylov, Juan Antonio Morente-Molinera, Francisco Javier Cabrerizo, Enrique Herrera-Viedma |
| المصدر: | Digibug. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada instname |
| بيانات النشر: | Elsevier BV, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Information Systems and Management, Computer science, Management science, Consensus measures, 05 social sciences, 050301 education, Multi-criteria group decision making, 02 engineering and technology, Resolution (logic), Computer Science Applications, Theoretical Computer Science, Group decision-making, Focus (linguistics), Argumentation theory, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Multi criteria, Computing with words, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Position (finance), 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing, Set (psychology), 0503 education, Software |
| الوصف: | The authors would like to thank the Spanish State Research Agency through the project PID2019-103880RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#71725001 and #71910107002) . The publication has also been prepared with the support of the "RUDN University Program 5-100". Recent multi-criteria group decision making methods focus their analysis on the experts preferences. They do not take into account the reasons why each expert has provided a specific set of preferences. In this paper, a method that introduces novel measures capable of explaining the reasons behind experts decisions is presented. A novel concept, the arguments are presented. They represent the experts have for maintaining a certain position in the debate. Several measures related to the arguments are proposed. These new argumentation measures, along with consensus measures, help us to get a clear idea about how and why a specific resolution has been reached. They help us to determine which is the most influential expert, that is, the expert whose contributions to the debate have inspired the rest. Also, the proposed method allows us to determine which are the arguments that most of the experts have followed. A clear overview about how the debate is evolving in terms of arguments is also provided. The novel presented analysis indicate how the experts change their opinions in every round and what was the reason for it, which changes have occurred between rounds and they also provide global analysis results. Spanish State Research Agency PID2019-103880RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 71725001 71910107002 RUDN University Program 5-100 |
| تدمد: | 0020-0255 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0f70338ce86797b841963cda4363691cTest https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.086Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....0f70338ce86797b841963cda4363691c |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 00200255 |
|---|