Budesonide Prophylaxis Reduces the Risk of Engraftment Syndrome After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Budesonide Prophylaxis Reduces the Risk of Engraftment Syndrome After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
المؤلفون: William R. Drobyski, Nirav N. Shah, Walter L. Longo, Timothy S. Fenske, Bicky Thapa, Anita D'Souza, Sergey Tarima, Muhammad Bilal Abid, Saurabh Chhabra, Huaying Dong, Parameswaran Hari, Binod Dhakal, Mehdi Hamadani
المصدر: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia. 21:e775-e781
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, Budesonide, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Engraftment Syndrome, Transplantation, Autologous, Gastroenterology, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Risk Factors, law, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Multiple myeloma, Aged, Hematopoietic cell, business.industry, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematology, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Rash, Transplantation, Diarrhea, Oncology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Female, medicine.symptom, Multiple Myeloma, business, 030215 immunology, medicine.drug
الوصف: Engraftment syndrome (ES) after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) encompasses a continuum of periengraftment complications characterized by noninfectious fever, rash, diarrhea, and capillary leak features.We analyzed the ES outcomes in 257 consecutive patients MM patients who underwent AHCT at our institution from 12/2017 to 11/2019 with budesonide prophylaxis (3 mg PO daily at day +5 post-AHCT till the time of discharge) (N = 109) and no prophylaxis (N = 148).The rates of ES were significantly higher in the no prophylaxis group versus prophylaxis group [69 (46%) vs. 23 (21%); P.001]. There was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS) [mean 15 (±3.2) vs. 16 (±2.8); P = .27] and 30-day readmission [9 (6%) vs. 8 (7%); P = .81] between the no prophylaxis and prophylaxis groups, respectively. On adjusted analysis, budesonide prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower risk of developing ES [odds ratio (OR) 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.51); P.0001]. There was no difference in the 30-day readmission rates [OR 1.12 (95% CI, 0.41-3.03); P = .81], but a trend for shorter LOS in the prophylaxis group [7.3% reduction in LOS (95% CI, -14.4% to 0%); P = .06].Budesonide prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of ES in MM patients undergoing AHCT. These promising results suggest the need for a randomized study investigate the role of budesonide for ES prophylaxis.
تدمد: 2152-2650
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0e0fb11bba44cd9a1ed14b2601b3ebebTest
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.004Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....0e0fb11bba44cd9a1ed14b2601b3ebeb
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE