Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories
المؤلفون: Harritshøj, Lene H., Gybel-Brask, Mikkel, Afzal, Shoaib, Kamstrup, Pia R., Jørgensen, Charlotte S., Thomsen, Marianne Kragh, Hilsted, Linda, Friis-Hansen, Lennart, Szecsi, Pal B., Pedersen, Lise, Nielsen, Lene, Hansen, Cecilie B., Garred, Peter, Korsholm, Trine-Line, Mikkelsen, Susan, Nielsen, Kirstine O., Møller, Bjarne K., Hansen, Anne T., Iversen, Kasper K., Nielsen, Pernille B., Hasselbalch, Rasmus B., Fogh, Kamille, Norsk, Jakob B., Kristensen, Jonas Henrik, Schønning, Kristian, Kirkby, Nikolai S., Nielsen, Alex C. Y., Landsy, Lone H., Loftager, Mette, Holm, Dorte K., Nilsson, Anna C., Sækmose, Susanne G., Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte, Aagaard, Bitten, Jensen, Thøger G., Nielsen, Dorte M., Ullum, Henrik, Dessau, Ram B.
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Microbiology; 2021, Vol. 59 Issue: 5 pe02596-20-e02596-20, 200257025p
مستخلص: Serological assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are needed to support clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations. Recently, assays for large-scale detection of total antibodies (Ab), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and IgM against SARS-CoV-2 antigens have been developed, but there are limited data on the diagnostic accuracy of these assays.
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:00951137
1098660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.02596-20