دورية أكاديمية

Thermal properties of harzburgite and dunite at 0.8–3 ​GPa and 300–823 ​K and implications for the thermal evolution of Tibet.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Thermal properties of harzburgite and dunite at 0.8–3 ​GPa and 300–823 ​K and implications for the thermal evolution of Tibet.
المؤلفون: Ge, Jianhua, Zhang, Baohua, Xiong, Zili, He, Lanfang, Li, Heping
المصدر: Geoscience Frontiers; Mar2021, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p947-956, 10p
مستخلص: Thermal diffusivity (D) and thermal conductivity (κ) of harzburgite and dunite from Luobusha ophiolite were simultaneously measured up to 3 ​GPa and 823 ​K using the transient plane-source method in a multi anvil apparatus. The results show that the values of D and κ of both samples systematically decrease with increasing temperature and increase with increasing pressure. By combination of the thermal physical data of rocks and minerals and geophysical constraints, we performed numerical simulation on the thermal evolution of Tibet vary over depth, distance and geologic ages. The present results provide new constraints on occurrence of partial melting and its geophysical significance beneath Tibetan crust. Image 1 • Thermal diffusivity and conductivity of harzburgite and dunite were measured at 300–823 ​K and 0.8–3 ​GPa. • D and κ systematically decrease with increasing T and increase with increasing P. • Numerical simulations provide new constraints on occurrence of partial melting beneath Tibetan crust. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Geoscience Frontiers is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:16749871
DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2020.01.008