دورية أكاديمية

Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 5: Using Patient Records: Selection, Protection, and Abstraction.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 5: Using Patient Records: Selection, Protection, and Abstraction.
المؤلفون: Roth, Carol P., Coulter, Ian D., Kraus, Lisa S., Ryan, Gery W., Jacob, Gary, Marks, Joyce S., Hurwitz, Eric L., Vernon, Howard, Shekelle, Paul G., Herman, Patricia M.
المصدر: Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics; Jun2019, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p327-334, 8p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MEDICAL practice, ALTERNATIVE medicine, BACKACHE, CHIROPRACTIC, DECISION making, DOCUMENTATION, INFORMATION retrieval, MEDICAL databases, INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems, MEDICAL quality control, MEDICAL ethics, MEDICAL records, NECK pain, PRIVACY, SURVEYS, INTEGRATIVE medicine, CONTENT mining, SYMPTOMS
مصطلحات جغرافية: UNITED States
مستخلص: The purpose of this paper is to describe the 4-step process (consent, selection, protection, and abstraction) of acquiring a large sample of chiropractic patient records from multiple practices and subsequent data abstraction. From April 2017 to December 2017, RAND acquired patient records from 99 chiropractic practices across the United States. The records included patients enrolled in a survey e-study (prospective sample) and a random sample of all clinic patients (retrospective sample) with chronic back or neck pain. Clinic staff were trained to collect the sample, scan, and transfer the records. We designed an online data collection tool for abstraction. Protocols were instituted to protect patient confidentiality. Doctors of chiropractic were selected and trained as abstractors, and a system was established to monitor data collection. In compliance with data protection protocols, 3603 patient records were scanned, including 1475 in the prospective sample and 2128 in the random sample. A total of 1716 patients (prospective sample) consented to having their records scanned, but only 1475 could be retrieved. Of records scanned, 19% were unusable owing to illegibility, no care during the period of interest, or poor scanning. The abstractor interrater reliability for appropriateness of care decisions was fair to moderate (κ.38-.48). The acquisition, handling, and abstraction of a large sample of chiropractic records was a complex task with challenges that necessitated adapting planned approaches. Of the records abstracted, many revealed incomplete provider documentation regarding the details of and rationale for care. Better documentation and more standardized record keeping would facilitate future research using patient records. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:01614754
DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.008