دورية أكاديمية

How Well Do Commonly Used Language Instruments Measure English Oral-Language Proficiency?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: How Well Do Commonly Used Language Instruments Measure English Oral-Language Proficiency?
المؤلفون: Pray, Lisa
المصدر: Bilingual Research Journal; Summer2005, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p387-410, 14p
مصطلحات موضوعية: ENGLISH language, LANGUAGE & languages, VERBAL ability, ORAL communication, COMPETENCE & performance (Linguistics), EDUCATION, STUDENTS, WOODCOCK-Munoz Language Survey
مستخلص: This research examines three tests commonly used to assess the English oral-language proficiency of students who are English language learners (ELLs): the Language Assessment Scales-Oral, the Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey, and the IDEA Proficiency Test. These tests were given to native English-speaking non-Hispanic White and Hispanic students from varied socioeconomic levels. Since these tests use native-language proficiency as the standard by which responses are evaluated, it is reasonable to expect native English speakers to perform extremely well on these instruments. The extent to which the native speakers of the language do not perform well on these instruments calls their validity into question. Findings indicated that none of the native English-speaking children who took the Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey scored in the "fluent" or"advanced fluent" English ability. One hundred percent of the students scored in the "fluent English speaking" range of the Language Assessment Scales—Oral, and 87% of the students scored in the "fluent English speaking" range of the IDEA Proficiency Test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Bilingual Research Journal is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:15235882
DOI:10.1080/15235882.2005.10162841