دورية أكاديمية

Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis.
المؤلفون: Watanabe, Jun, Ichimasa, Katsuro, Kataoka, Yuki, Miki, Atsushi, Someko, Hidehiro, Honda, Munenori, Tahara, Makiko, Yamashina, Takeshi, Yeoh, Khay Guan, Kawai, Shigeo, Kotani, Kazuhiko, Sata, Naohiro
المصدر: Digestive Endoscopy; May2024, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p533-545, 13p
مصطلحات موضوعية: LYMPHATIC metastasis, COLORECTAL cancer, RECEIVER operating characteristic curves, TUMOR budding, ENDOSCOPIC surgery, COHEN'S kappa coefficient (Statistics)
مستخلص: Objectives: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a critical risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM), which requires additional surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the impact of additional staining on estimating LNM is unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of additional staining on determining LNM in T1 CRC. Methods: We searched five electronic databases. Outcomes were diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), assessed using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and interobserver agreement among pathologists for positive LVI, assessed using Kappa coefficients (κ). We performed a subgroup analysis of studies that simultaneously included a multivariable analysis for other risk factors (deep submucosal invasion, poor differentiation, and tumor budding). Results: Among the 64 studies (18,097 patients) identified, hematoxylin–eosin (HE) and additional staining for LVI had pooled sensitivities of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.58) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.44–0.86), specificities of 0.88 (95% CI 0.78–0.94) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.62–0.86), and DORs of 6.26 (95% CI 3.73–10.53) and 6.47 (95% CI 3.40–12.32) for determining LNM, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the DOR of additional staining for LNM (DOR 5.95; 95% CI 2.87–12.33) was higher than that of HE staining (DOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.13–3.16) (P = 0.01). Pooled κ values were 0.37 (95% CI 0.22–0.52) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.04–0.99) for HE and additional staining for LVI, respectively. Conclusion: Additional staining for LVI may increase the DOR for LNM and interobserver agreement for positive LVI among pathologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Digestive Endoscopy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:09155635
DOI:10.1111/den.14691